STEPHEN Flynn is risking the anger of SNP members with a bid for Holyrood – but may be doing so to establish himself as a successor to John Swinney, Professor John Curtice has said.
The eminent polling expert spoke to The Sunday National about the potential impact of Flynn and other SNP MPs’ decisions to stand for Holyrood while retaining their Westminster seats, which is known as “double-jobbing”.
Flynn’s announcement that he would aim to stand for the Scottish Parliament in the 2026 election earlier in the week was soon followed by similar announcements from MPs Dave Doogan and Stephen Gethins. The SNP’s remaining six MPs will not be looking to run, it is understood.
The three’s decision has led to some concerns within the party, especially given that in 2021 the SNP National Executive Committee (NEC) put a rule in place which required MPs wanting to run for Holyrood to first resign their place at Westminster.
READ MORE: 'We can't keep changing rules': Activists split over SNP MPs applying for Holyrood
Then-MP Joanna Cherry said she could not make her staff redundant and decided not to stand – a result which was largely seen as the reason behind the NEC’s decision.
However, First Minister John Swinney has said that the party can change the rules if members choose – and SNP insiders have been briefing media saying that the 2021 rule was “election specific” and does not automatically apply to 2026.
Asked for his view, Curtice said there that it was difficult to say whether the data showed that an election candidate’s double-jobbing made people any less likely to vote for them.
“I'm not aware that anybody ever proved it,” he said, adding that former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross’s high-profile loss of his Westminster seat in July was likely more impacted by the fact that it was “a controversial decision for him to stand in the first place … than the fact that he might be double-jobbing”.
“It clearly causes internal party rows,” he said.
“It's one of those things that really exorcises party members, and it certainly exorcises those whose careers might be on the line.
“So, it’s clearly the case that the person who's currently the SNP MSP for the seat is none too happy. That's Stephen Flynn's decision.”
Curtice said that the SNP NEC’s rule from 2021 was “particularly tough” – noting that it went further than laws banning double-jobbing elsewhere in the UK.
READ MORE: Michael Marra 'ridiculous' for criticising Scottish higher taxes, say SNP
“The law in both Northern Ireland and now in Wales does actually rule out double-jobbing,” he said, “but you're not required to resign until you find yourself in that situation.”
“Jeffrey Donaldson was elected to the Stormont Assembly in the last Northern Irish election while still being a Westminster MP. He then simply resigned.”
The SNP NEC looks unlikely to reimpose the 2021 rule forcing MPs to resign before standing for Holyrood. Doing so could see them force by-elections in one-third of all their Westminster seats.
Curtice said the General Election results in July, which saw Scottish Labour win the majority of seats north of the Border, were “an obvious reason why from their point of view it would not be a good idea”.
Asked if that could look like a Flynn coronation, which may also irk SNP members, Curtice said: “That’s the risk Flynn is taking.”
However, Curtice said that “frankly anybody from the other political parties who comments, it's a slight case of the kettle calling the pot black”.
“All of them, all of them, did it when Holyrood was first created, and the SNP since, including particularly by [Alex] Salmond twice. So friends of Salmond should probably keep silent, and of course the Tories should.
“The Tories can say, ‘well, you criticised us’, but that's just yahoo politics.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel