THREE Extinction Rebellion protesters have attempted to lock-on to the Scottish Parliament building, with messages related to the proposed new gas power station in Peterhead.
Two were successful, one was prevented by police at Holyrood, and it is understood keys to the locks were sent to three MSPs; First Minister John Sweeney, Gillian Martin, and Alasdair Allan.
XR Scotland believes that these three MSPs have the responsibility of deciding on the new gas power station in Peterhead proposed by fossil fuel company SSE and Norwegian state-owned Equinor, who claim the facility will utilise carbon capture and storage technology.
READ MORE: Thousands sign petition calling on government to reject new gas plant
Police confirmed two of the protesters have been charged and will appear at Edinburgh Sheriff Court at a later date.
It comes after Friends of the Earth (FoE) said that emissions from the Peterhead 2 facility, which would be built alongside the existing power station, could be five times higher than the site’s developers SSE and Equinor have disclosed in planning documents.
Research commissioned by the group reveals that there were “serious omissions and shortcomings in the developer’s environmental impact assessment (EIA) report, resulting in a severe underestimation of the project’s climate impact”.
The protest took place before First Minister's Questions.
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: “Around 11.40am on Thursday November 7 2024, we were made aware of a group of protesters on Horse Wynd, Edinburgh.
“Officers attended and two women aged 46 and 69 have been arrested and charged in connection.
“They have been released on an undertaking to appear at Edinburgh Sheriff Court at a later date.”
John Hardy, 41, community organiser speaking for XR Scotland, said: "Our protest at the Scottish Parliament is about calling for meaningful action against the climate crisis. CCS is not the solution its made out to be; it is a lifeline for oil and gas companies who wish to continue extracting fossil fuels while cloaking themselves in the illusion of environmental responsibility.
"We cannot allow our future to be dictated by 'magical' technological fixes that merely prolong the fossil fuel era and distract from the urgent need for a rapid and just transition to renewable energy. We demand real solutions, not empty promises. Our lives depend on it."
READ MORE: Ministers ‘misled’ on environmental impact of new power plant
In 2021, Extinction Rebellion Scotland took action at the current Peterhead gas power station by blockading the entrance to the facility locked-on to a green washing machine and with a green washing line, in protest of SSE's sponsorship of COP26.
Gary Jack, 62, chartered surveyor and crofter, speaking for XR Scotland, said: "If saving the planet is not a good reason for rejecting the application, economic logic certainly is. Tying Scotland to a further 25 years plus of imported gas gives us no energy security and open to further inflated international gas prices.
"Scotland already produces vast amounts of renewable electricity and will be doubling or trebling that over the next decade. So why would you invest in imported gas infrastructure?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article