THE Scottish Government has given a cautious welcome to spending pledges in the Budget.
Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the Budget was a “step in the right direction” but warned that the Scottish Government still faced “enormous cost pressures” in the immediate future.
The SNP minister said that an extra £1.5 billion from the UK Government in this financial year had “already been factored into our spending plans” – meaning the Scottish Government will not reverse its policy to mirror the cut to Winter Fuel Payments.
The Treasury has assuaged fears that hiking National Insurance contributions for employers would put additional strain on the Scottish public finances by pledging to cover the expected cost of £500 million.
READ MORE: What was in Rachel Reeves's Budget for Scotland? See the key points
Robison said: “By changing her fiscal rules and increasing investment in infrastructure, the Chancellor has met a core ask of the Scottish Government.
“But after 14 years of austerity, it’s going to take more than one year to rebuild and recover – we will need to see continued investment over the coming years to reset and reform public services."
The Finance Secretary added that it was “disappointing” Chancellor Rachel Reeves had stuck by the two-child benefit cap and Labour’s abolition of the universal Winter Fuel Payment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel