Martin Lewis has responded to Rachel Reeves's Autumn Budget.
In a historic speech, the Chancellor said "the country voted for change" at the General Election.
Reeves said they will "fix the foundations and deliver change through responsible leadership in the national interest".
Some key announcements included:
- Taxes raised by £40bn, including increases to employer National Insurance contributions;
- The minimum wage will be increasing by 6.7% to £12.21, while for those aged 18-20 will get a 16.3% bump to £10 an hour;
- £11.8bn will be provided to compensate those infected and affected by the infected blood scandal;
- £1.8bn will be provided to compensate the victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal;
- £240m for 16 projects targeted at those who are "economically inactive" and most at risk of being out of education, employment, or training;
Today is the first time in our country’s history that a Budget will be delivered by a woman.
— Rachel Reeves (@RachelReevesMP) October 30, 2024
For every young girl watching, let this be a sign that there should be no ceiling on your ambitions. https://t.co/lKNXMwJTxk
Now, Money Saving Expert founder and finance guru Martin Lewis has responded to the Budget.
READ MORE: Budget means 'additional £3.4bn for Scotland', Chancellor says
Martin Lewis responds to Rachel Reeves's 'very LONG' Budget and tax rises:
£40bn of tax rises - that is very big indeed
— Paul Johnson (@PJTheEconomist) October 30, 2024
Martin said on X, formerly known as Twitter: "So she isn't reversing the 2% Tory NI cut to employees, but shifting it to employers.
"So the rabbit out of the hat was 'not extending the freeze on tax & NI thresholds' beyond what was planned to 2028.
READ MORE: Follow Budget updates live as Chancellor says £3.4bn funding available for Scotland
"An extension of that would've only been on paper anyway, as it could always be changed, increased or reversed at future budgets.
"The change of threshold so employers now start paying National Insurance at £5000 not £9100 is big. For the employers who pay it, at the new 15% rate that alone's £615 increased cost per most employees per year.
"The question is where will that money come from, profits, increasing charges or reducing salaries/benefits?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel