“I REGRET voting for them now.”
That was the response I was given when asking one Rutherglen resident about their view of the new Labour Government so far.
The area elected Scottish Labour’s Michael Shanks, who was later made an energy minister in the UK Government, in the July General Election.
Scots voted for what Shanks and Labour were promising: change. But the overwhelming feeling from people on the ground in Rutherglen was that they have so far failed to deliver it.
“People were expecting a Labour Government to be for the poor and for the elderly and for the oppressed – and to me it’s just like the Tories,” one man told this paper.
That really summed up how the majority of people were feeling. And one issue came up again and again: the Winter Fuel Payment.
The arguments for making the benefit means-tested may be sound – but the heavy-handed cut which Labour imposed was far from the best way to do it.
It only saved the UK Government around £1.3 billion this year – and there is no doubt that Labour underestimated just how much it would cost them.
READ MORE: SNP not given place on Westminster's Scottish Affairs Committee
“They've probably demonstrated the same incompetence as the last government,” one Rutherglen local told The National.
“So far, it is early days, but they haven't really hit the ground running, in my opinion, and that's principally because to me, they've made very stupid fiscal decisions about who they're targeting.”
The idea that Labour had entered power only to “target” the elderly – instead of the rich or big business – came up again and again. People felt that they were having money taken out of their pockets, instead of those with much deeper ones. Some even said they were rationing heating as a result.
The optics of entering power only to take away a benefit which many people relied on has cut through, and no doubt fed the rising cynicism about politics among the UK public.
On Sunday, the i reported new polling which found that people had grown more cynical since the General Election. Among Labour supporters, just 17% said they felt well represented by the party – compared to 26% before the July ballot.
That paper further reported: “More than three quarters of voters now believe that politicians ‘only look out for themselves’, according to the findings by Public First – and a similar proportion say that politicians do not care about the views of the public.”
Seb Wride, from Public First, said: “People just don’t believe that political action will happen – commitments and announcements all feel meaningless, and it’s hard to see a way back.”
While that poll paints a nationwide picture, it is demonstrated on the ground in places like Rutherglen.
There, people feel that they have changed one heartless UK Government for another. And with Keir Starmer warning of a “harsh” fiscal reality and a “painful” Budget, is there any wonder?
The message from Rutherglen was clear. If Labour want to – as they put on page one of their manifesto – restore hope, they must start offering it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel