A GUEST on CNN will no longer feature on the news network following a panel discussion in which he appeared to say he hoped a Muslim journalist was blown up in a bomb attack.
The incident started during a panel on Monday, when writer Ryan Girdusky and journalist Mehdi Hasan were discussing Donald Trump’s recent rally at Madison Square Garden as well as accusations the presidential candidate is spreading Nazi-style ideas.
Girdusky told Hasan, an outspoken supporter of Palestinian rights, that he is often branded as antisemitic by his opponents.
Girdusky to Hasan: I hope your beeper doesn’t go off pic.twitter.com/YmHhYnkDZ3
— Acyn (@Acyn) October 29, 2024
Hasan replied by saying he was a “supporter of the Palestinians so I’m used to it” to which Girdusky said: “Yeah, well I hope your beeper doesn’t go off.”
The journalist then asked Girdusky: “Did you just say I should die?”
Girdusky denied on air that he had said this as guests started to speak over one another and host Abby Phillip tried to intervene.
READ MORE: Energy firms say zonal pricing won't help Scots save money on bills
Hasan suggest Girdusky was inciting violence against him and that CNN allowed a panellist to suggest “the Muslim guy should be blown up”.
On air, Girdusky claimed his comments came because he thought Hasan had said he supported Hamas.
“You didn’t think I said Hamas. I said I’m a supporter of Palestinian rights,” Hasan said.
“At least have the guts to support your racist comment,” he later added.
Following a break, the show returned with neither Girdusky or Hasan present with Phillip apologising to viewers.
She said: “When we get this discussion started you’ll see that Ryan is not at the table. There is a line that was crossed there and it’s not acceptable to me, it’s not acceptable to us at this network.
“We can have conversations about what is happening in this country without resorting to the lowest of the low kind of discourse.”
In a separate statement, the network said: “There is zero room for racism or bigotry at CNN or on our air.
READ MORE: Israel votes to ban UNRWA – everything you need to know
“We aim to foster thoughtful conversations and debate including between people who profoundly disagree and debate including between people who profoundly disagree with each other in order to explore important issues and promote mutual understanding.
“But we will not allow guests to be demeaned or for the line of civility to be crossed. Ryan Girdusky will not be welcomed back at our network.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel