THE Chancellor must introduce a package of measures to bring down energy bills by £450 for the average household if Labour are to make good on their General Election pledges, the SNP have said.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out the UK Government’s tax and spending plans on Wednesday in what will be the first Labour Budget in more than 14 years.
The SNP’s work and pensions spokesperson Kirsty Blackman urged the Chancellor to make good on Labour’s pledge to reduce energy bills by £300.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar defends GB Energy chief's England base
The party also demanded the Government reinstate universal Winter Fuel Payments for pensioners after Reeves cut them back.
Due to the new price cap, which began in October, a typical household’s annual energy bill has increased by £149 to £1717.
Blackman (below), the MP for Aberdeen North, said Labour must now reduce bills by £449 in order to meet its pre-election promise – calling on ministers to set out a timetable for doing so.
She said: “Keir Starmer promised voters he would reduce energy bills by £300 but instead bills have gone up again on the Labour Party’s watch – with a typical household now paying £149 more a year.
“Instead of tackling the soaring cost of energy, the Labour Government has made it even worse by increasing household energy bills by 10%, taking £600 in Winter Fuel Payments from pensioners, and proposing to increase fuel duty for millions of motorists.
“It’s no wonder the Labour Party’s poll ratings have plummeted so quickly when they have already broken so many promises – and left millions of households worse off.”
Blackman added: “If the Chancellor wants to repair the damage to the Labour Government’s reputation, she must abandon her plan to impose billions of pounds of austerity cuts and fuel duty rises, and introduce a package of measures to slash bills, including reversing the cuts to the Winter Fuel Payment, introducing a social tariff, and finally announcing when it will reduce bills by £300.
“It’s shameful that some of the poorest and most vulnerable people will be forced to choose between heating and eating this winter as a result of Labour Party cuts.”
The Treasury has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel