AN emergency motion opposing plans for the National Care Service has been overwhelmingly passed at the Scottish Greens conference.
The motion, which was proposed by Glasgow Green Cllr Anthony Carroll and the party’s health spokesperson Gillian Mackay MSP, called for the bill to be radically reduced in scope to focus on increasing support and rights to those providing care, including unpaid carers.
The motion says the bill in its current form is "contrary to Green values".
READ MORE: Common Weal: Why we won't support the National Care Service
The move comes after Scotland's largest trade union body called for the withdrawal of the National Care Service bill and local authority umbrella body Cosla withdrew its support for the proposals amid pay concerns.
The vote casts the future of the bill not doubt as Green MSP votes could be crucial on whether it will progress or not.
At Scottish Greens conference, Carroll (below) argued the same and highlighted the need for a "practical solution".
“Councillors across the country are deeply concerned that the National Care Service as proposed will take away local accountability of social care and leave it in the hands of Scottish ministers," Carroll said.
He added: "Greens will always stand for the empowerment of local authorities who have local expertise and knowledge. If we centralise that power with the Scottish Government on social care and social work we would see that lost."
Speaking in support of the motion, Mackay also argued for a reformed version of the bill which reduces its scope.
"What I envisage for this going forward is speaking to all of the councillors," Mackay said.
"What I plan to do is to bring forward a paper in the next couple of weeks with where we take red pen through the current bill, leaving some of the provisions."
READ MORE: NC500: Call for partial ban on motorhomes and caravans
She added: “There are some positives within the Bill that I hope MSPs from all parties would want to see enacted. For example, giving people living in care homes the right to see and spend time with loved ones, greater support for carers to take personalised respite breaks, and greater access to advocacy and information.
"The government must radically rethink and reduce the scope of this Bill. That means focusing on increasing support and rights to those providing care, including unpaid carers. Without that fundamental change and shift in focus we cannot support it.”
Shona Robison admitted on The Sunday Show she would need to compromise with opposition parties to pass the National Care Service Bill.
The Finance Secretary said she still wanted to go ahead with the plans while finding common ground among MSPs.
“We’ll continue to discuss with the other parties and stakeholders where there is potential room for compromise,” she told the BBC programme just before it was announced that the Greens’ motion had passed.
“I think there are some really important principles in the National Care Service, that point about national standards, about quality.
“It’s hard to see how anyone could disagree about wanting to have national standards so that people in one part of Scotland receive the same quality of service as another.
“I don’t see why anyone would disagree with that but I really hope that on the principles, and those voices in support of the National Care Service, will be listened to a little more.”
“Clearly there will have to be compromise,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel