SAILORS on a six-month nuclear submarine patrol were ordered to share rations because it ran so low on food.
Medics feared a “serious loss of life” on the Vanguard-class vessel which had to patrol for more than half a year owing to a shortage of workings subs, according to The Sun.
The National reported earlier this year how new images of the UK's deteriorating submarines sparked concerns they could be putting crews at risk.
Plans to resupply at sea were scrapped for unknown reasons, so bosses reportedly asked crew members to hand in their sweets and chocolate.
Submariners searched for leftover food packets and cans, and an honesty shop in the canteen closed over fears of hoarding.
Caffeine tablets were apparently handed out by medics amid fears tiredness could lead to a mistake or loss of life.
READ MORE: Man's body recovered from water near Scottish island
A former sub captain briefed on conditions aboard the vessel told the paper: “Horrific is the only word.”
A second source said: “It was miserable. If you weren’t on watch your movements were limited to conserve energy and encouraged to sleep to burn less calories.”
One of the Navy’s four Vanguard-class subs is always on patrol in case of a nuclear attack.
Originally Royal Navy policy was for the Vanguard-class submarines to spend a maximum of 80 days at sea, for the welfare of the crew. The shortage of working subs, however, has led to much longer patrols.
READ MORE: Subscribe for just £10 and enjoy our brilliant Sunday paper
HMS Vengeance set a record when she returned to HMNB Clyde in March after being away for six months and 18 days. HMS Vigilant spent 195 days on patrol before that.
The other subs are HMS Vanguard and HMS Victorious. They all carry up to 16 Trident missiles.
A Navy spokesperson said: “Every submariner receives a nutritionally balanced diet at all times.
“Robust procedures ensure crew safety at all times on missions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel