LABOUR Government ministers have refused to explain Sue Gray’s “nations envoy” role – despite challenges from MPs highlighting that they are in breach of government guidance.
The SNP’s Brendan O’Hara was one of the MPs to raise the issue of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff with the UK Government on Thursday – as her salary, job description, and start date all remain a mystery.
O’Hara told the Commons: “As you can imagine, the people of Scotland are beside themselves with excitement, in fact they seem fair giddy at the prospect of receiving a visit from this Prime Minister's special envoy.
“But as we prepare the red carpet and the mass pipe bands to welcome her, can I ask exactly what was his department's role in the creation of this post? When will we see a published job description? And when will she finally take up this post officially?”
Responding, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden declined to answer any of the questions posed.
He said: “All I would say to the House is I'm enormously grateful to the Prime Minister's former chief of staff for her efforts as chief of staff.
“I do believe that we want good, normal working relationships with the Scottish Government, and anything to do with the post will be announced in due course.”
READ MORE: John Swinney says he 'won't be dealing with envoys' following Sue Gray's appointment
On October 6, Gray announced her resignation as Keir Starmer’s chief of staff after bitter infighting in Downing Street spilled out into the public realm. She was replaced by Morgan McSweeney, a close aide of Starmer, and handed a role as the UK Government’s “envoy to the nations and regions”.
However, in the weeks that followed Gray has been absent, including from key events she was expected to attend – such as the inaugural meeting of the Council of Nations and Regions in Edinburgh on October 11.
There has been no job description or salary published for Gray’s new role, and the UK Government on Wednesday declined to say if she was on paid or unpaid leave – or if she was still earning the £170,000 paycheque she had as chief of staff.
On Thursday, the Tories’ shadow Cabinet Office minister John Glen also raised the issue of Gray’s role and its salary.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer urged to 'make immediate statement' on Sue Gray envoy role
He told the Commons: “We support the new Government’s aspirations for the highest ministerial standards and acknowledge the significant experience that the Prime Minister’s former chief of staff can bring to her role as envoy to the nations and regions.
“So why then, in breach of Cabinet Office guidance, have ministers not published a word on her terms of reference, her new salary or her spad [special adviser] severance payment? Or is she correct in her understanding that she’s top of the list of new peers?”
Responding, Cabinet Office minister Ellie Reeves said: “Anything in relation to the former chief of staff will be announced in due course.
“It’s not right for me to comment on the terms and conditions of any individual.”
And in the Lords, Labour Government whip Ruth Anderson said Gray was "on holiday".
“We are delighted that the Council for Nations and Regions is now up and running and will be meeting again in the spring," Anderson said.
“Sue Gray has been appointed as the envoy, but obviously has had a busy two years while she got ready for ensuring that the Labour Party won the General Election, so is taking a holiday.”
Pressed further on the status of the former top aide, Anderson said: “Sue Gray has been appointed. I am not sure of her start date. I am not in charge of HR for the Government.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel