ANAS Sarwar has been slammed for claiming during the General Election that the new Labour Government would save jobs lost by the closure of the Grangemouth refinery.
During a debate hosted by STV between all of Scotland’s party leaders in June, the Scottish Labour leader was asked by political editor Colin Mackay whether a new Labour Government would save Grangemouth.
“We would step in to save the jobs at the refinery and invest in that transition by making an energy transition hub at Grangemouth,” he responded (below).
During the general election campaign Anas Sarwar promised a new Labour Govt would step in and save all of the jobs at Grangemouth. It was a lie. He's yet to be challenged on the lie. pic.twitter.com/26w12ngWiS
— MSM Monitor (@msm_monitor) October 21, 2024
“And we’ll put hundreds of millions of pounds behind it to make it a reality, to protect those jobs.”
Now, the SNP have hit out at the claim – with MSP Michelle Thomson saying Sarwar made “a lot of commitments during the election campaign which he has failed to deliver on”.
It comes after new Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said that the UK Government cannot guarantee a new job for every worker who could be laid off when Grangemouth closes next year.
Plans for the closure of the site in the second quarter of next year, with the loss of up to 400 jobs, were announced by owners Petroineos last month.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar slammed for progressive taxation 'flip flop' after Budget
On Thursday, the UK and Scottish Government announced a £500,000 project that will see “bespoke support” offered by Forth Valley College to help workers build on current skills and develop new ones to help them find new work in the green energy sector.
But Murray (below) said that, while both Governments were doing what they could to secure work for those under threat, it could not provide an assurance everyone would be employed ahead of the refinery closure.
“Government can’t give that guarantee,” he told reporters.
“What we are trying to do is put the conditions in place to make sure all the opportunities are open.”
Thomson – who represents Falkirk East which includes Grangemouth – said it was her job to do “everything in my power to protect those jobs”.
“I am calling on the Scottish and UK governments to work with Ineos to delay their planned closure,” she said.
“The economic impact of the closure is significant, putting nearly 3000 jobs and the important chemical cluster based around Grangemouth at risk”.
Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel