The UK and Welsh governments have announced the largest review of the water sector since privatisation – as the Environment Secretary claimed nationalising the firms would “not resolve the problems” faced by customers”.
In Scotland, public drinking water and sewerage services are provided by Scottish water – a publicly owned company accountable to Scottish ministers and the Scottish Parliament.
However, Environment Secretary Steve Reed said the money to pursue nationalisation in England “doesn’t exist” and rivers, lakes and seas would be “filled with even more sewage and pollution” during the time it would take to unpick current models ownership.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn pokes fun at Labour Party at PMQs after Trump complaint
The UK and Welsh governments have announced what they said was the largest review of the sector since it was privatised, with an independent commission chaired by the former deputy governor of the Bank of England, Sir Jon Cunliffe.
It will focus on the water sector and its regulation, and will have no limits in the scope of its potential recommendations, including wholesale reform of Ofwat and how it interacts with other watchdogs such as the Environment Agency.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay (below) raised the “scandal” of sewage in seas and rivers before telling Reed: “Since privatisation, £72 billion has been paid to shareholders in dividends while his own department highlights that it would cost £56bn to carry out the necessary investment.
“So privatisation has failed as a model for getting the investment in place.
“And will the Secretary of State, therefore, confirm the commission will look at the ownership model for water that’s going to be effective in addressing this scandal, including considering the option of bringing water back into public hands?”
Reed replied: “The reason I’ve ruled out nationalisation is because that would not resolve the problems that we face.
“We see at the Olympics in France the River Seine unable to be used for swimming because of pollution – that is a state-owned water system. We see the problems in Scotland – that is a state-owned water system as well.
“The problems are those of governance and regulation. If we were to look at nationalisation that would cost up towards £100bn of public money, money that doesn’t exist, and the time it would take to unpick current models of ownership – during which time investment would be choked off – would see our rivers, lakes and seas filled with even more sewage and pollution rather than less.
“I’m more interested in the purity of our water than the purity of our ideology. I will do what works best as quickly as possible, the commission will give us guidance on how to change the system to make sure it works for everybody.”
READ MORE: Anti-monarchy group to protest at upcoming Labour Budget
Ministers say the Water Commission’s recommendations, which will be handed to them in the second quarter of next year, will form the basis of further legislation to attract long-term investment and clean up the country’s polluted waterways and coasts.
The move comes after years of underinvestment, a growing population and extreme weather caused by climate change have led to intense pressure on England’s ageing water system, causing widespread flooding, supply issues, sewage pollution and leakages.
Public fury has swelled over the degraded state of the country’s rivers, lakes and coastal waters and at a lack of investment in water infrastructure, rising bills, high dividends and debt and executive pay and bonuses at privatised water firms.
Campaigners who want to see the water sector renationalised criticised the review for continuing with privatisation.
Matthew Topham, lead campaigner at We Own It, said: “The review is deaf to the calls of the public, anti-sewage groups and the international community to wrestle with the root cause of the sewage crisis: privatisation.
“Without serious thought, this Labour Government will be remembered for its re-privatisation of England’s water system – repeating a failed experiment which has been studiously avoided the world over.”
But a spokesperson for industry body Water UK said the sector welcomed the commission.
“Our current system is not working and needs major reform. The regulatory system is overly complex and too slow to approve vital new infrastructure.
“New homes have been blocked and even a new cancer hospital has been held up due to a lack of water.
“We hope this Water Commission can take a fundamental look at the root causes and provide clear recommendations on the changes needed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel