SCOTS have every right to be passionate about Saltires being replaced with Union flags on products as national branding is an “integral part of Scotland's pride”, a campaigner has said.
The practice of “Union Jackery”, when Scottish products are advertised with a Union flag instead of the St Andrew’s Cross, has accelerated over the last 10 years following David Cameron’s “Great” campaign to promote Britain internationally, according to campaigners.
One industry in particular which The National has repeatedly reported on is the food and drink sector, where produce like fruit and veg, grown in Scotland, has been branded with Union flags.
READ MORE: Outrage over Union flags on Scottish fruit in Sainsbury’s
The food and drink industry is a major contributor to Scotland’s economy, with the latest figures from the Scottish Government showing the sector generates turnover of around £15 billion.
According to the Government, one of the main reasons why the country’s food and drink sector is so successful is because as a nation Scotland produces high-quality, rather than high-volume, products.
Ruth Watson (below), founder of the campaign group Keep Scotland the Brand which aims to maintain the integrity of Scottish branding on products, said it helps people feel connected to their national identity.
Watson said the food and drink sector is focal to the Keep Scotland the Brand campaign as it is universal – all Scots “need to eat”, as she puts it.
She went on to explain that Scots have already faced many battles around their culture and heritage, and one of the reasons “Union Jackery” is rejected by a large group of Scottish people is due to many of them taking pride in their food.
“The ways in which we see ourselves, and obviously within Scotland, are that we have had to battle, to fight in many respects, for our language and our culture,” said Watson.
“One of the reasons why I use food and drink a lot within the Keep Scotland the Brand campaign is because it's something that people find tangible.
“If you can make a philosophical argument tangible and real to people in their daily lives, then they can connect with it much more.
“And my goodness, people across Scotland have really responded very, very passionately about Scotland's brand.
“So, whether it's our culture, it's our heritage, whether it's our universities, whether it's our reputation and stem, which all are global.
“It all comes back for many people to the food in front of them because we all have to eat. “It’s because Scotland's food and drink sector is so important and so iconic, everybody can relate to it.”
Watson explained that the erasing of Scottish branding transcends political ideologies and is something that is universally fought for.
She said she has spoken to farmers who are Unionists and have walked out of supermarkets in disgust due to seeing their produce wrapped in Union flags.
Watson said that by replacing the farm's Scottish identity, it has wiped away years of hard work put into building a reputation and market loyalty with customers, as their national identity had become synonymous with quality.
Ewan MacDonald-Russell, deputy head of the Scottish Retail Consortium, said retailers' decisions on using Scottish-specific labelling will be driven by multiple factors.
READ MORE: SNP demand ‘cast-iron guarantee’ on tax hikes ahead of Labour Budget
Some of those factors included regulatory compliance, cost, and the importance of the branding to consumers. However he added that regardless of the labelling used, retailers' long-held support for Scottish producers and farmers would not be affected.
MacDonald-Russell (below) said: “Retailers buy billions of pounds of Scottish produce each year, to sell in Scotland, the UK, and other markets. Where product lines are aimed at a purely Scottish market retailers will often choose to use saltires or similar markings.
“However, in many cases these products are aimed at a wider market and therefore UK markings are used.
“Decisions on labelling are driven by regulatory compliance, cost, and the importance to consumers. Retailers will ultimately judge whether the benefits of Scottish-specific labelling outweigh those other factors.
“However, none of that will impact on retailers long-held and considerable support for Scottish producers and farmers.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel