THE senator who interrupted King Charles’s speech in the Australian Parliament House has defended her actions, accusing the monarch of “stealing” land from indigenous people.
On Monday, Australia’s first indigenous senator for the state of Victoria, Lidia Thorpe, berated King Charles near the end of his speech in Canberra.
“You are not our king, you are not sovereign,” she said as security removed her from the venue.
“You have committed genocide against our people. Give us our land back. Give us what you stole from us.
“Our babies, our people. You destroyed our land.”
NEW: This is the moment King Charles's speech in Australia's Parliament House was interrupted by Senator Lidia Thorpe, who told him: 'You are not my King'
— The National (@ScotNational) October 21, 2024
🗣 'You have committed genocide against our people.' pic.twitter.com/KkExsbCGTb
Last year, Australians voted no in a historic referendum on a plan to amend the constitution to recognise First Nations people and create a body which would allow them to advise the Australian government.
Thorpe opposed the so-called Voice to Parliament plan and instead called for a legally binding treaty between First Nations people and the Australian government.
Speaking to Sky News, Thorpe said she had interrupted Charles’s speech in a bid to draw attention to the plight of indigenous people in the country.
“I did it for truth telling,” she said.
READ MORE: Senator interrupts King Charles's speech to accuse him of 'genocide'
“Global truth telling about the royals who cause so much devastation to not only our people in this country but indigenous people around the world.
“We don’t have a treaty in this country, we’ve been calling for decades and decades for a treaty.
“Our jails are full of aboriginal people. We have 23,000 aboriginal children that have been taken from their families.
“We have over 600 deaths in custody where no one has ever been held accountable.
“We have our bones and our skulls still in his [King Charles] possession, or his family’s possession.
“We want that back, we want that land back and we want your King to take some leadership and sit at the table and discuss a treaty with us.”
Sky News presenter Kay Burley then asked Thorpe why she had called King Charles “genocidal”.
Thorpe said: “There’s thousands of massacre sites in this country from invasions and someone needs to answer for that.”
Burley replied: “And that’s the King?”
“If he is the successor, then he needs to answer,” said Thorpe.
Burley then raised the comments of another Australian senator, who said Thorpe had abused her position and described her interruption as “disgraceful”.
READ MORE: Scottish group welcomes Aussie senator's King Charles protest
“I’m not fussed about what people say about me,” said Thorpe.
“I will continue to fight for justice for my people. We are the real sovereigns in this country.
“The King is not our sovereign. The King lives in your country, he’s from your country, he can’t be our King.”
Some indigenous leaders in Australia had hoped that King Charles would offer an apology to them during his speech.
However, while he offered his respects “to the traditional owners of the land on which we meet”, he stopped short of apologising for the royal family's historical role in the colonisation of Australia.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel