JOHN Swinney tore into Anas Sarwar on NHS investment as he accused the SNP of creating an "NHS crisis all year round".
Sarwar challenged the First Minister on hospital waiting times and delayed discharge at FMQs, as he highlighted how the Scottish Government had previously pledged to"clear all waits" over two years by September 2022.
But Swinney took the Scottish Labour leader to task stressing the Government had invested more in the NHS than had been handed to it by Westminster via the Barnett Formula, citing a £19.5 billion "record investment in the NHS".
He told Sarwar: "We have to recognise that the Government can only allocate the resources that it has at its disposal and we are allocating a record amount of funding.
READ MORE: What Kemi Badenoch vs Robert Jenrick means for the Scottish Tories
"As Mr Sarwar knows, in the climate of austerity that we have wrestled with for the last 14 years under the Conservative government, this places significant challenges on the resources we have put in place, but we have exceeded the amount of money that was allocated through the Barnett Formula to the health service.
"We’ve exceed that because of the commitment of this Government. So if Mr Sarwar thinks it will help by following his approach on taxation, which would reduce public expenditure in Scotland by £1.5bn, that will not the health service one little bit if we were to follow Mr Sarwar."
Swinney then hit back at Sarwar further repeating the claim from UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting (below) earlier this year that "all roads lead back to Westminster" when it comes to NHS funding.
The First Minister went on: "And as the UK Secretary of State for Health said when he was in opposition that 'all roads do lead back to Westminster' on funding.
"We wait to find out what the [UK] Budget will tell us when Parliament comes back after October recess. Let’s see if the Labour Party breaks with austerity, because what Mr Sarwar has put to me is a demand for more investment and we are not getting that from the Labour Government."
Swinney also ripped into Keir Starmer's first 100 days in office.
The First Minister was fielding a question from Labour MSP Paul O’Kane about fair work and worker’s rights in Scotland.
Highlighting that O'Kane had mentioned his party's first 100 days as the UK Government, Swinney said: "In the 100 days we've had the cut to Winter Fuel Payments for pensioners which nobody expected to come from a Labour government that was prepared to protect the rich and punish the poor. What on earth has the Labour Party been up to in its first 100 days in office?"
READ MORE: Analysis: Anas Sarwar getting weaker by defending his UK Labour bosses
Meanwhile, Swinney accused Russell Findlay of talking "complete nonsense" after the Scottish Tory leader suggested the SNP had "stacked the entire justice system against crime victims".
The Scottish Government was due to announce whether some long-term inmates will be released early in a bid to ease overcrowding in Scotland’s jails later on Thursday.
Figures released on Wednesday revealed the prison population across the country was 8305 – just over 100 off the all time high of 8420 recorded back in 2012.
The target capacity for Scotland’s jails in 8007.
Swinney said the claim from Findlay was "patently untrue".
"Over the last decade, the average length of prison sentences has increased by 32%," said Swinney.
"That statistic alone demonstrates Mr Findlay is putting complete nonsense to me at First Minister's Questions.
"98% of all those convicted of rape and attempted rape between 2019 and 2022 received a custodial sentence. That is another fact that refutes what Russell Findlay has put to me."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel