THE elimination of James Cleverly from the Conservative Party leadership contest is being met with shock and dismay by party members following the shock result.
Despite receiving the most number of votes in a previous ballot of Tory MPs, Cleverly was knocked out of the contest on Wednesday in the fourth and final ballot of MPs.
It means that the only candidates who remain —Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick — come from the hard right of the party.
Speaking to PA, one Tory MP said they were now getting messages from local members saying “what the hell are you doing?”
READ MORE: James Cleverly eliminated from Conservative Party leadership race
The MP said: “One of two things has happened. Either a number of people lent James Cleverly their votes yesterday and rolled them back.
“Or James Cleverly’s lent votes to Robert Jenrick and over-egged it.”
However, there was also speculation that some MPs had backed their second favourite candidate, assuming their preferred choice was already safe.
The MP said supporters of both Jenrick and Badenoch had been asking MPs suspected of backing Cleverly to lend support to one of them to get them on the ballot.
The Tory source said they did not “fall for that” but “it’s possible some people may have been dumb enough”.
"The rules need serious reform," he said on X/Twitter.
"I am not with any of the camps, but it seems tactical voting has taken place on an industrial scale either yesterday, today, or both.
"It pains me to say it, but one STV ballot paper - rather than multiple rounds - would probably solve it."
"This is the serious business of selecting a Leader of the Opposition and prospective future Prime Minister.
"It shouldn’t be done on the whim of a dozen MPs trying to be too clever."
The decision is likely to spell trouble for Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay, with the two remaining candidates seeking to outflank Reform UK by leaning into increasingly right-wing policies.
Last week, Badenoch suggested she would make major changes to the devolution settlement if she becomes prime minister and Jenrick has campaigned on removing the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights.
Indeed, Findlay's reaction to the news was notably muted.
When asked by STV if he thought any of them would "be any good", he said:
"We'll have to see who wins".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel