THE Scottish Greens have said the UK Government’s plans to pour billions of pounds of funding into carbon capture is no substitute for investment in renewable energy.
On Friday, Keir Starmer announced nearly £22 billion of funding for carbon capture projects in Merseyside and Teeside.
The “carbon capture clusters” are set to emerge over the next 25 years with thousands of jobs promised.
Yet while the SNP highlighted that the Acorn carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire had once again been passed over by the UK Government, the Scottish Greens said it was an act of greenwashing to pour so much money into largely unproven technology.
READ MORE: SNP push for inquiry into Labour 'cash for access' scandal
“Carbon Capture is a costly and unproven technology that is often used to justify our continued reliance on fossil fuels,” said the party’s co-leader Lorna Slater.
“It is no substitute for clean, green and renewable energy and must not distract us from the investments that we need to be making and the green change that we need to deliver.
“The billions of pounds that Keir Starmer is pouring into CCS would be much better spent on cutting people’s electricity bills, investing in green skills and proven industries and boosting energy efficiency and public transport.
“Global temperatures are rising around us and the situation is urgent. All governments badly need to be moving away from oil and gas.
“We can not greenwash our way out of the crisis we are in, and must not put our hopes on technology that doesn’t deliver the carbon capture rates being promised and is being pushed by polluters to allow them to keep drilling our North Sea.
“Scotland has the skilled workers and resources to invest in renewable technology that will make a real difference here and now. Both the Scottish and UK governments must invest in that rather than pumping money into giving companies permission to pollute.”
It comes after climate campaigners in Scotland said the technology had largely failed to deliver on its promises and claimed funding it directed money away from bolstering renewable energy infrastructure and electrifying public transport systems.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel