THE UK has agreed to hand over its last African colony to Mauritius, ending years of dispute.
The sovereignty of the remote Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean will be handed to Mauritius after more than half a century in return for securing the long-term future of a strategically important military base.
The UK expelled the Chagossians in the 1960s and 1970s in what has been described as a crime against humanity, when it retained possession of what it called the British Indian Ocean Territory, or BIOT, after Mauritius gained independence in 1968.
The agreement follows rounds of negotiations that began in 2022 after Mauritian arguments for sovereignty were recognised by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the UN general assembly and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea (Itlos) in 2019 and 2021.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour MP breaks ranks calling for UK to stop arms sales to Israel
Britain was found to have unlawfully separated the Chagos Islands from Mauritius before granting independence in 1968.
The UK initially defied UN votes and court judgments demanding it return the islands, emphasising that the ICJ ruling was only an “advisory opinion”. An attempt to halt the negotiations, on the basis the Chagossians were not consulted or involved, failed.
The deal will include the UK handing over the tropical atoll of Diego Garcia, used by the US government as a military base for its navy ships and long-range bomber aircraft.
But the US-UK base will remain on Diego Garcia – a key factor enabling the deal to go forward.
The deal is still subject to finalisation of a treaty but both sides have vowed to complete this as quickly as possible.
"Following two years of negotiation, this is a seminal moment in our relationship and a demonstration of our enduring commitment to the peaceful resolution of disputes and the rule of law," the statement from Prime Minister Keir Starmer (above) and Mauritius Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth read.
The leaders also said "both our countries are committed to the need...to ensure the long-term, secure and effective operation of the existing base on Diego Garcia which plays a vital role in regional and global security."
Both parties said the treaty would "address wrongs of the past and demonstrate the commitment of both parties to support the welfare of Chagossians".
The deal has angered the Conservatives with leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick saying: “It’s taken three months for Starmer to surrender Britain’s strategic interests.
READ MORE: Laura Kuenssberg 'mistake' questioned as Boris Johnson interview axed
“This is a dangerous capitulation that will hand our territory to an ally of Beijing.”
James Cleverly, another Tory leadership contender, said: “Weak, weak, weak! Labour lied to get into office. Said they’d be whiter than white, said they wouldn’t put up taxes, said they’d stand up to the EU, said that they be patriotic. All lies!”
Another leadership hopeful Tom Tugendhat added: “This is a shameful retreat undermining our security and leaving our allies exposed.”
The Foreign Office said the agreement is supported by the US and means the status of the base will be undisputed and legally secure.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel