LAURA Kuenssberg pulling her Boris Johnson interview at the last minute has been described as “staggering” with viewers concerned by her claims she made a “mistake”.
The BBC presenter posted a tweet late on Wednesday evening to say that while prepping for the interview – originally set to air on Thursday night – she sent the former prime minister briefing notes “by mistake” in a message “meant for my team”.
She claimed this led to a “frustrating” decision to call off the interview as it was “not right” for it to go ahead.
But viewers have since become suspicious about her explanation, with some questioning why another presenter could not step in after the apparent blunder.
Author Edwin Hayward reacted to the news tweeting: “Staggering. Just staggering.
READ MORE: Labour warned cuts plans are 'Liz Truss levels of economic vandalism'
“Feels like a mistake too huge to brush under the carpet in a single tweet.”
Former academic and author Dan Evans asked whether there would be further investigation into the cancellation of the interview.
Think most people- & not just lefties- would assume that LK got caught out/slipped up and is now trying to spin it as an innocent mistake. Can’t remember a journalist so openly, embarrassingly, enamoured with a politician in my lifetime. Wonder if there will be an investigation?
— Dan Evans (@dai_alectic) October 3, 2024
He said on Twitter/X: “Think most people- and not just lefties- would assume that LK [Laura Kuenssberg] got caught out/slipped up and is now trying to spin it as an innocent mistake.
“Can’t remember a journalist so openly, embarrassingly, enamoured with a politician in my lifetime. Wonder if there will be an investigation?”
The interview with Kuenssberg was set to be Johnson’s (below) first serious grilling about his time in Downing Street since his departure and coincided with the imminent release of his book, Unleashed.
As an experienced journalist, some have questioned why she couldn’t have come up with another set of questions Johnson had not seen, while others could not understand why another leading interviewer, such as Victoria Derbyshire, could not have talked to him in her place.
READ MORE: Kemi Badenoch makes devolution threat in Tory conference speech
Nazir Afzal tweeted: “She could, of course, ask some different questions that Boris Johnson hasn’t seen in advance. For a change.”
“How, do you accidentally send an email intended for multiple members of your team, to the sole email address of your intended interviewee…and why didn’t you simply ask @vicderbyshire to step in (with her questions)?,” said Martin Cymbal on Twitter/X.
Other broadcasters and politicians decided to sarcastically offer up their services in Kuenssberg’s place.
Sharing Kuenssberg’s explanation, LBC radio presenter James O’Brien (below) said: “I’ll do it.”
Channel 4’s Cathy Newman also posted: “He’s welcome on Channel 4 news instead!”
Journalist Alice Jones also joked the debacle should be dramatised, as the Prince Andrew Newsnight interview was on streaming platforms.
She said: “Looking forward to the Netflix dramatisation of this, followed by the Amazon Prime one a couple of months later.”
On Wednesday evening, a BBC spokesperson said: "Tomorrow’s interview with Boris Johnson won’t be going ahead.
“As Laura has explained, interview briefing notes meant for colleagues were inadvertently shared with him. This makes an interview tomorrow untenable.
“Under the circumstances, both the BBC and Mr Johnson’s team have agreed this is the best way forward."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel