THE transfer of benefits to Scotland’s social security system from the UK Government has reached a major milestone.
Almost two-thirds (63%) of adults in Scotland who were previously getting the Personal Independence Payment from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) are now receiving the Adult Disability Payment.
It marks a key stage in the project to devolve the disability and carer benefit awards of everyone in Scotland, which the Scottish Government says will allow them to benefit from a system “based on dignity, fairness and respect”.
The Adult Disability Payment was designed in partnership with disabled people to be better than the benefit it is replacing.
A significant improvement was ending the time-consuming and demanding re-assessments carried out by the DWP to decide if someone’s support should continue.
READ MORE: Kemi Badenoch makes devolution threat in Tory conference speech
In Scotland these have been replaced with "light touch" reviews that ensure people are getting the right support without requiring them to provide unnecessary information or face a private sector assessment.
Sylvia Paton, who is registered blind, said she had been put through a “humiliating” experience in her assessment with DWP.
She said: “A lot of people have been put through an assessment process where it feels as though staff are trying to trip you up and implying you are lying about your disability.
“The DWP made me go for a medical assessment. We went into a room with a window facing the door and it was an instant white out for me.
“The lady said, ‘take a seat,’ but I couldn’t see one and she didn’t tell me where it was. It was just awful and humiliating. It was all about ticking boxes with no understanding of my medical condition.
“I didn’t experience anything like that going from PIP to Adult Disability Payment. It was very automatic and painless.”
All disability and carer benefits are expected to be transferred to Social Security Scotland by the end of 2025, with benefit awards for disabled children already fully transferred.
James Kyle, 41, delayed telling the DWP about his deteriorating eyesight due to his “traumatic” experiences with them.
On his benefits being transferred, he said: “There was a long form to complete but when I asked for help a gentleman went through the form with me on a video conference call. I couldn’t have asked for a better service and my payment was uprated.”
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar called out over 'more capital investment' pledge
A recent survey found almost 90% of people who had their disability benefit moved to Social Security Scotland said they were informed about the process and the communication was clear.
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: “This is an important milestone in the devolution of benefits to Scotland.
“People who received DWP benefits talked about the system being inhumane. They had experienced a system which did not get the decision right first time and which involved degrading assessments run by private providers.
“That worry is over for many now as we have moved the awards of hundreds of thousands of people to our new system, where they can benefit from its founding principles of dignity, fairness and respect.
“We are continuing to transfer the awards of disabled people from the DWP to our new system.”
The DWP has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel