A planning application submitted by Ally McCoist's company for a plush new residential development has attracted nearly 300 objections from angry villagers.
The application has been put forward by Erskine-based company James (Glasgow) Ltd which lists the former Rangers star and Jeffrey East as company directors.
A previous report in 2018 told how the football legend had joined up with East to create the venture, which at the time was described as being "involved in the buying and selling of own real estate”.
The pair hope to build 38 houses and flats of contemporary design on a site of vacant land on the western boundary of number 24 Thriplee Road in the Bridge of Weir.
The site is described in planning documents as "effectively open countryside", "some 2.4 hectares in size" and "bound by housing on three sides".
Included in the proposal are plans to construct nine detached houses, six semi-detached houses and 23 flats split into three individual blocks.
A whopping 337 public comments have been received in response to the application, with 278 opposing and 59 supporting the plans.
In their objections, residents raised concerns about issues such as increased traffic, a lack of local infrastructure including schools and doctors surgeries to accommodate the development, and the potential flood risk to existing properties.
Other concerns raised included the safety of cyclists and pedestrians including children walking to and from school, noise concerns and the impact on the “significant local bat population”.
One resident said: "This village is bursting at the seams. Drs/dentists/schools are at full capacity. Traffic through the village is high enough. There are not enough car parks.
"No social housing. Waiting lists for social housing are at the highest level for years.
"Public transport is the worst it has been for years which will mean much more cars from new residents as there is no public transport links for commuting.
"Where is the infrastructure to support another influx of people?
"When is Renfrewshire Council ever going to actually listen to the people who live in this village and stop seeing pound signs.
"This is shameful greed and profiteering."
Supporters of the plans, meanwhile, pointed to a need for more local housing and said the plans would bring benefits such as "creating jobs" and "more hope of the rail track coming back".
One resident said: "The village is in need of more diverse housing for the likes of younger people, families also for downsizing. This development would bring more custom to local businesses."
The planned development includes a mix of three and four bedroom homes and flats with either two or three bedrooms.
There is one existing house within the proposed development site, a single-storey home at number 25 Thriplee Road, which is owned by the applicant.
As well as the new homes and flats, the application also outlines plans for associated access, landscaping, open space and other required infrastructure.
The proposed primary point of access to the site for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles is from a continuation of Thriplee Road.
The plans, which were received and validated in July, are currently awaiting decision by Renfrewshire Council planners.
The applicant's agent has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel