JOHN Curtice has said Keir Starmer’s “political antennae are weak” and he is “not very good at setting a narrative”.
The top pollster spoke on Times Radio about the Prime Minister’s diminishing popularity, with another poll from Opinium over the weekend showing his net approval ratings now stand at -30%, down almost 50 points since he took on the position.
In just 11 weeks after coming into power, Starmer is now viewed less favourably than both former prime minister Rishi Sunak and leader of Reform UK Nigel Farage.
Curtice suggested it wasn’t surprising Starmer was facing problems, adding “he wasn’t popular in the run-up to the election”.
READ MORE: GMB: Brian Cox gives verdict on Keir Starmer's time as Prime Minister
He said Starmer is not very good at “spotting problems before they hit him”, as he criticised his decision to welcome former Conservative MP Natalie Elphicke into the parliamentary Labour Party earlier this year before she stood down at the election.
Curtice added that he “shares a weakness” with Sunak in not being good at setting a narrative.
Curtice said: “Keir Starmer is not a popular politician. He wasn’t popular in the run-up to the election. He got a bit of a boost having won the election, his ratings went up – surprise, surprise – but they’ve gone down pretty quickly.
“This is simply the re-emergence of a problem that was firstly clear.
“What are the problems? Well I would pick out two. One is that he is not very good at setting a narrative, frankly he shares that weakness with Rishi Sunak. And the question is whether any of the four candidates for this party can come with a narrative.
“The second is that his political antennae are weak. He’s not very good at spotting problems before they hit him. We saw that when he admitted Natalie Elphicke to the parliamentary Labour party, the former Conservative MP for Dover and Deal.
“And immediately the question that was always going to be asked was ‘what about Diane Abbott?’ and it took them a long time to realise they needed to deal with Diane Abbott’s suspension.”
READ MORE: Russell Findlay slammed for 'independence dream is dead' comment
Abbott was readmitted as a Labour MP at the end of May after being suspended more than a year before when she said Jewish, Irish and Traveller people do not face racism "all their lives".
Curtice also said he thought the UK’s two-party system may have “effectively died a death” at the General Election, as he reflected on the need for the Conservatives to win back voters from Reform and Labour.
He said: “The big parties could no longer assume that the contest is simply between them.
“It’s perfectly obvious, in the case of the Conservative example, that while yes, they need to get back around the one in eight people who switched to Labour from them, they also need to get back the roughly one in four who switched to Reform.
“All parties now are going to have realise that 2024 may be the election in which the two-party system effectively died a death.”
The winner of the Conservative leadership contest to replace Sunak will be announced on November 2, with Kemi Badenoch, Robert Jenrick, Tom Tugendhat and James Cleverly all vying for the position.
Curtice said the challenge facing the party is “very, very considerable”.
He added the lack of name recognition of the four remaining hopefuls may make it harder for the party to rebuild.
“The party is being asked to choose between four candidates and none of whom is particularly well known by the wider public, indeed not even particularly well known by the diminishing number of people who actually voted Conservative in July,” said Curtice.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel