JOHN Swinney fired back at Anas Sarwar during FMQs after the Scottish Labour demanded the sacking of Scotland's Housing Minister.
Figures earlier this week showed that the number of new homes built in Scotland had plunged 17% last year.
During the same period, councils had to deal with a rising number of homeless applications, with Scottish Government data showing there were 33,619 households classed as homeless in 2023-24.
As of March 31 this year, there were 16,330 households in temporary accommodation – with this up by 9% on last year to the highest total recorded by the Scottish Government.
Speaking in Parliament, Sarwar demanded that minister Paul McLennan lose his role as a result of the news.
SNP government," Sarwar said.
“Housing in Scotland is completely the responsibility of this“After 17 years, when will they take responsibility, rather than always look for someone else to blame?
“For the Housing Minister to claim they have a ‘proven track record’ on tackling homelessness, when it is at record levels, is not just inept, it is shameful.
“Paul McLennan simply cannot continue.
“The First Minister has a choice: put up with more failure or get to grips with the housing emergency, sack this Housing Minister and change direction.”
READ MORE: Labour's new 'climate envoy' Rachel Kyte linked with £4m party mega-donor
In response, Swinney accused Sarwar of "always playing the man and not the issue".
He argued that under the SNP government, an average of 7750 affordable homes have been built annually while the figure was 5448 under the last Scottish Labour administration.
"That says to me that this government is getting on with the job," the First Minister told MSPs.
He continued to respond by arguing that while housing is devolved, Westminster funding has been slashed.
READ MORE: Andrew Marr blasts 'ridiculous' Gaelic signs in parts of Scotland
"Mr Sarwar said to me that this area of policy is all under the responsibility of the Scottish Government and to an extent that is true," he said. "Housing policy is our responsibility. But there is a budgetary question here.
"Let me just point out to Mr Sarwar that our capital budget, which is what builds affordable homes, is facing a cut of near 9% under the current spending plans of the last Conservative government and the incoming Labour government that they're going to carry on with. Our financial transactions budget has been cut by a whopping 62%.
"I have raised with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and with the Deputy Prime Minister the absolute total stupidity and folly of presiding over a 62% cut in the financial transactions budget.
"So if Mr Sarwar would like to help Scotland in any way, shape or form, why doesn't he persuade the UK Labour Government to desert the Tory agenda and to start investing in our country?"
READ MORE: This was the only moment that an uninspired Labour conference lit up
Early on Thursday, the Scottish Government confirmed investment of £100m will be used to support the construction of about 2800 mid-market homes for rent across the country.
The money, announced in First Minister John Swinney’s Programme for Government earlier this year, will be topped up with cash from institutional investors – which should take the overall funding total to a minimum of £500m.
The move comes as part of a commitment by the Scottish Government to leverage in more private sector cash for housing, helping to make public resources go further.
It comes after the Thriving Investments scheme used an initial £47.5m of Scottish Government cash as part of a £222.5m project to deliver 1200 mid-market homes in Scotland.
Such properties can help provide accommodation for those lower incomes, and can also help people struggling to get a council or housing association home.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel