SCOTLAND’S just transition commission has said a Scottish island’s experience of the transition to renewables “provides significant learnings for the whole country”.
In a new report launched in Lerwick in Shetland on Tuesday, the commission said a new statutory right for communities to have a share in renewables developments can “super-charge the creation of community wealth”.
The report said that Shetland’s experience managing the development of oil and gas infrastructure at Sullom Voe from the 1970s, combined with the rapid expansion of wind energy over the past decade, can help to shape fairer outcomes for communities across the country.
It added that there were significant social and economic benefits to local communities such as Shetland being able to “exert a measure of local democratic control over energy infrastructure developments”.
Shetland’s local authority secured special powers 50 years ago to negotiate with oil companies following the discovery of oil near the islands, including an ability to act as a port authority, establishing a charitable trust and charging “disturbance payments” to reflect the impact of the industry on the local area.
READ MORE: Scottish university to play leading role in hydrogen production from waste heat
The report also highlighted the need to improve the delivery of peatland restoration projects, with around 77% of peatland on Shetland believed to be damaged, emitting a significant amount of carbon dioxide as a result.
The commission is an independent expert advisory group with members drawn from business, industry, trade unions, environmental and community groups, and academia.
It aims to ensure the benefits and burdens of the major changes involved in Scotland’s net zero transition are shared as fairly as possible, and is tasked by the Scottish Government to produce an annual assessment of progress towards a just transition to a low carbon economy.
Prof Dave Reay, co-chair of the commission, said: “The commission’s report sets out a number of practical measures to support local communities, like Shetland, in making the most of the opportunities the transition to a low carbon economy brings for economic and social renewal.
“Our conversations left us with a sense that Shetland has a number of distinctive assets that will help shape its transition for the better.
“It has a small, close-knit community with lots of relevant expertise, and it is relatively easy to bring people together for meaningful social dialogue on important questions.
READ MORE: Avengers film has 'positive tourism impact on Borders village'
“There’s also a common belief that if we can find the right process, new forms of economic activity can help to make a better and fairer place.”
Tom Wills, director of Lerwick-based research consultancy Voar and co-author of the research report, said: “Shetland’s strong winds, prime development sites and capable workforce make the islands an attractive location for new energy projects.
“Locals are however concerned that while further large-scale development seems guaranteed, a fair share for the community is not.
“Despite hosting oil and gas terminals and the UK’s most productive onshore wind farm, Shetland suffers from high inequality and fuel poverty.
“More jobs and economic activity won’t fix this because Shetland already has low unemployment and relies on fly-in workers.
“As new energy developments accelerate, we have found that government at all levels – UK, Scottish and local – could be doing more to ensure communities are not left behind.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel