IAN Murray has been forced to retract allegations he made that a journalist “made up” a story he would have a multi-million pound war chest to tackle poverty.
In a TV interview on Sunday, Murray furiously hit back after he was confronted with press reports which had set out how Labour planned to give the Scotland Office £150m to tackle poverty.
The story had initially run in the Daily Record before the election and was followed up in its sister title the Sunday Mail in August, after the election.
There was no previous public suggestion from Murray or Labour the stories were wrong.
But asked about them on the BBC Sunday Show by host Martin Geissler, Murray accused the journalist of having fabricated the figure.
In a statement released through a spokesperson later on Sunday, Murray conceded the figure had been based on past “Levelling Up” funds allocated to Scotland which it had been envisaged the Scotland Office could repurpose.
Now he has admitted the numbers were “not made up”.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar branded 'desperate' ahead of conference speech attacking SNP
Murray told the Daily Record on Monday: “The point I was trying to make was we don’t have any money yet, in the sense of the Scotland Office being a spending department.
“The figures that are in the public domain were calculated using previous structural funds money which was in the manifesto.”
The plans would require the Scotland Office to become a “spending department” which would require changes to be brought about in a Budget or a similar fiscal event.
They would remain controversial if they are followed through because they would be seen by critics to be bypassing the devolution settlement by allowing the UK Government to spend money in Scotland without consulting Holyrood in devolved areas of policy.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel