A SCOT believed to have suffered torture at the hands of the Indian authorities has been denied bail in a move supporters say should “shock the UK Government into action”.
Jagtar Singh Johal, a Dumbarton man known to his friends as Jaggi, was denied bail at the High Court of Delhi in seven cases brough against him by India’s National Investigations Agency.
He was previously granted bail in March 2022, when the High Court of Punjab and Haryana found that his imprisonment without trial for a period of five years at that point had violated his right to justice.
This was appealed by the National Investigations Agency but the Supreme Court found in his favour, challenging prosecutors to present credible evidence against Jaggi – something they were unable to do.
The most recent denial of bail is at odds with the Supreme Court’s 2023 order and supporters said it is subject to challenge.
Reprieve, a UK human rights charity supporting Jaggi (above), said the cases brought against him – including arms trafficking, conspiracy to commit murder and terrorism – are based on a “false confession” he gave after police allegedly tortured him with electricity and threatened to burn him alive with petrol.
The organisation said that in the nearly seven years he has been imprisoned, prosecutors have failed to build a substantial case against him.
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom regards Jaggi as a victim of politically-motivated stitch-up because of his campaigning work to expose the human rights violations of the hardline Hindutva government of Indian premier Narendra Modi.
READ MORE: Family of imprisoned Scot say Jaggi denied video calls despite court order
Gurpreet Singh Johal (below), Jaggi’s brother who recently met with First Minister John Swinney to discuss the case, said the Indian authorities “can’t come up with any evidence against him because there isn’t any”.
He said: “Today’s ruling is a harsh reminder that the system is stacked against him. Prosecutors are able to drag out the case, potentially for decades, to deny him justice.
“Even these simple bail applications have taken more than a year to be considered because the prosecution has sought so many needless adjournments.”
Reprieve demanded the UK Government take action in light of the ruling.
READ MORE: John Swinney demands urgency from UK Government to push for Jaggi release
Harriet McCulloch, the organisation’s deputy director, said: “These bail rulings should shock the UK Government into action.”
She accused India of “keeping a British human rights activist in arbitrary detention” while Jaggi’s home country “stands by”.
McCulloch added: “The UK Government should be actively seeking his release, doing whatever it takes – the important thing is to get him out of prison.”
The UK Government was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel