AN INTERNATIONAL group of leading experts have said that nuclear power has no place going forward in Scotland.
Six academics, from universities across the UK, France, Japan and the US, argued that nuclear would cost taxpayers more money than constructing renewable alternatives.
Nuclear power contributes as much electricity in a year as renewables adds every few days, while also being hugely less efficient in tackling carbon emissions, the group said.
The group of academics includes Prof Steve Thomas, Dr Paul Dorfman, Prof MV Ramana, Prof Amory Lovins and Tetsunari Iida.
In the statement, they said after more than 60 years of commercial history, nuclear power is getting further from, not nearer to, being able to survive without massive public subsidies.
READ MORE: Blair Jenkins reflects on 10-year anniversary of Scottish independence referendum
It added that constructing new plants takes considerably longer than renewable equivalents as according to the UK Government’s Regulated Asset Base Model Impact Assessment, new nuclear takes up to 17 years for the planning, regulation, and construction of just one station.
The statement argues that the International Panel on Climate Change reported that renewables are now 10 times more efficient than nuclear at CO2 mitigation.
It reads: “Nuclear power has never been economic, and its real costs have continued to rise throughout its history. In the past, nuclear survived because electricity was a monopoly, and electric utilities could pass on the cost, no matter how high.
“The introduction of competitive electricity meant this option was lost, causing the finance market to turn away from new nuclear.”
It adds: “The more concerned you are about climate change, the more vital it is to buy cost-effective, fast, sure, renewable options rather than expensive, slow, speculative nuclear.”
The statement also concluded that “renewables are the only technology available for a rapid transition from fossil fuels” and that nuclear power should no longer be a consideration.
Latest figures from the Scottish Government show that renewable technologies generated the equivalent of 113% of Scotland’s overall electricity consumption in 2022 – which was up 26% from 2021.
According to the academic's statement the share in energy production by renewable technologies has also considerably increased over the past few years globally.
It highlighted the fact that China is now installing wind and solar technology, which has the same energy-producing capacity to five new nuclear reactors, every week.
“With new nuclear stagnating and renewables soaring, the sober reality is that nuclear power is just too costly and too late for the climate and energy crises,” the statement said.
READ MORE: Scottish independence white paper 'was not a blueprint for new nation'
The experts concluded there is no business case for nuclear going forward in the UK as it said: “We need to secure affordable, sustainable, low-carbon energy to power industry, transport, homes, and businesses.
“Since all key energy international organisations and institutes agree that renewables will do the heavy lifting for net-zero, the future backbone of the world’s power supply will be clean, green, safe, and cost-effective. Nuclear is none of those.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel