WES Streeting has claimed there is “fairness at the heart” of the Labour Government’s decisions following cuts to the universal Winter Fuel Payment.
It comes after Labour MPs voted to impose a £1.4 billion cut on pensioner benefits by scrapping the universal payment and stripping around 10 million pensioners of cash to help people pay their energy bills.
On Wednesday, Keir Starmer refused to come clean on the impact of cutting the benefits as he refused to commit to publishing an impact assessment of the policy, which critics say risks the lives of thousands of pensioners.
"Given the dire straits that the NHS is in, should you really be nicking money off pensioners?" - @KayBurley
— Sky News (@SkyNews) September 12, 2024
Health Secretary @wesstreeting says pensioners 'will still be better off' this winter than they were in 2023.
➡️ https://t.co/OLufWoxtxz
📺 Sky 501 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/vfn6nOw1jp
Speaking to Sky News’s Kay Burley, the Health Secretary said “more hard choices” were still to come although said pensioners would be better off this winter compared to last year.
Asked specifically if he had done an impact assessment on cutting the payment, Streeting said: “We don’t normally do impact assessments day-to-day. There will be an impact assessment on all of the fiscal decisions around the Budget and the spending review.”
Pressed further on this, Streeting said: “Well the Conservatives know full well that we don’t normally do impact assessments on every policy decision day-to-day.
READ MORE: SNP leaders beware. You and Labour are starting to sound the same
“There is going to be an impact assessment on all of the Budget and spending review. There will be an impact assessment that takes into account the cumulative decisions the Chancellor makes.
“We’ve got fairness at the heart of what we are doing and as I say I know it’s hard and if I think about the sickness in our society, the sickness in the NHS and the sickness in the public finances, the medicine doesn’t always taste good but it’s a damn sight better than the alternative and that’s why we are making difficult choices.”
The host also asked him how he “sleeps at night” after voting to remove the payment for so many pensioners.
He replied: “How do I feel? I feel really angry that we’ve walked into a situation with a £22bn black hole.
“Our predecessors spent the national reserve three times over in an act of profligacy and waste unprecedented outside of a crisis like the pandemic.
“I think they should be ashamed of themselves and we are now cleaning up their mess, that’s hard. The medicine is hard to swallow.”
READ MORE: Jenny Gilruth slams Unionist MSPs over Scottish Budget cuts
Streeting also claimed the Tories would not “take responsibility” although Burley accused him of “deflecting from the question” as she said it was "outrageous" to "take money away from pensioners".
“It’s not deflection, it’s about responsibility. It is outrageous. A £22bn black hole, it's outrageous.” he said.
In a separate interview with BBC Breakfast, Streeting was also grilled on the impact assessment.
BREAKING
— MSM Monitor (@msm_monitor) September 12, 2024
Wes Streeting has confirmed that Labour didn't carry out any impact assessment before cutting the pensioner's winter fuel payment. He also signalled other groups face similar cuts. pic.twitter.com/hBE1IvfZ88
He was asked by host Charlie Stayt: “You have done a report, as I understand it, that sits possibly on your desk looking at the assessment in terms of the potential health impact of the changes your government has brought in.
“Why can the public and the media not see that report?”
Streeting replied: “There’s no such report and there’s no such report on my desk.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel