This article is part of our collaboration with The Ferret. Each edition will see a different issue in Scotland tackled, and this time we're looking at seawilding and the potential future of carbon capture. Sign up for the free monthly newsletter HERE.
THE climate crisis is already impacting Scotland, with more rainfall and higher temperatures recorded in recent years.
Storing CO2 to prevent it from entering the atmosphere is central to the fight against climate change. The Scottish Government is backing technological projects to capture and store carbon from industrial sites.
However, there are also several ways that CO2 can be stored through natural processes. As part of our Solutions for Scotland project, Ferret Fact Service looked at the different ways to store carbon.
Trees
WOODLANDS are important for carbon storage, also known as sequestration. As trees grow, they “trap” carbon to form wood, leaves and roots. This prevents it from entering the atmosphere and contributing to the climate crisis.
There is an estimated two billion tonnes of carbon stored in Scotland’s woodland and forests.
Tree cover in Scotland has increased in the past 100 years, but it still lags behind many other European countries. About 16% of Scotland is covered by trees, with an average of between 700 to 800 tonnes of carbon sequestered per hectare.
The Scottish Government aims to increase this to 21% by 2032. It has consistently missed its targets for new woodland planting in recent years, meeting 90% of the 16,500 hectares planned to be planted last year.
There has been criticism of the tree-planting approach in Scotland, with fast-growing and carbon-absorbing non-native species like Sitka spruce favoured over native species and restoration of diverse woodlands.
READ MORE: The possibilities of seawilding and the future of carbon capture
Analysis by The Ferret of official forestry data has shown Sitka spruce makes up 43% of woodlands in Scotland. This “invasive” species can negatively impact protected bogland and heathland, and damage biodiversity, according to experts.
Soils
ACCORDING to NatureScot, there are more than a billion tonnes of carbon in Scotland’s soils in bogs, peat and swamps, making up the largest source of sequestered CO2.
Twenty per cent of Scotland is covered by peatlands, which hold more than half of the land-based carbon storage.
When in good condition, peat soil is what’s known as a “carbon sink”, which absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, damaged peatlands can become an emitter of greenhouse gases.
According to the International Union for Conservation, damaged peatlands are responsible for almost 5% of human-caused CO2 emissions across the world. In Scotland, degraded peatlands account for 15% of all carbon pollution.
It was estimated in 2020 that about 80% of Scotland’s peatlands were degraded.
The Scottish Government has set annual targets of at least 20,000 hectares of peatland restoration every year. These have been repeatedly missed. Currently, restoration rates are around just 6000 hectares annually.
Seas
THE ocean, sea lochs and coasts in and around Scotland are a key source of carbon storage, known as “blue carbon”. About 25% of all carbon dioxide emissions in the world are absorbed by seas.
While living species such as those found in saltmarshes and sand dunes, as well as seagrass, kelp beds and coral reefs can store carbon, the vast majority of the “blue carbon” is stored in the seafloor and sediments found in sea lochs.
READ MORE: How can we solve the higher education funding crisis in Scotland?
According to the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Spice), more than nine billion tonnes of carbon is stored in Scotland’s surrounding seas. There are several threats to Scotland’s “blue carbon” storage such as the impact of climate change, fishing practices and pollution. Degraded carbon storage habitats could release their CO2 and become sources of carbon emissions in the future.
Carbon Capture and Storage
THE Scottish Government’s plans for reducing carbon emissions heavily focus on the use of technology to capture CO2 from industrial processes. This is known as carbon capture and storage (CCS).
It works by capturing carbon from processes which usually pump it into the atmosphere — like oil refineries and cement plants — then transporting it to a safe location where it can be stored, usually deep underground.
CCS can have a significant impact on the carbon emitted from industry and aims to capture more than 90% of carbon dioxide where it is used.
Scotland’s long-term goal of reducing net emissions to zero by 2045 is reliant on the use of CCS. However, it has yet to be deployed at scale in Scotland.
The Acorn project, a CCS facility that is planned for Aberdeenshire, has received funding from the Scottish Government but has faced delays in approval from the UK Government.
Scotland’s climate change plan update from 2020 suggested the plant had the potential to capture as much as 10 megatonnes of CO2 per year by 2030, but climate campaigners have called these targets “speculative” and “unreliable”.
Scotland's carbon storage in numbers
Peat
80% – The proportion of Scotland’s peatlands that are degraded.
15% – How much of Scotland’s total emissions are produced by degraded peatlands.
Trees
16% – How much of Scotland is covered by forests and woodlands
Seas
25% – Proportion of global carbon dioxide emissions absorbed by oceans.
Seagrass
92% – How much of the UK’s seagrass may have been lost, according to research.
11.5 million – How many tonnes of carbon it has been estimated the UK’s seagrass meadows once stored, the same as the emissions of 7.7 million cars.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here