THE leader of Glasgow City Council has said she was “really pleased” to see a small turnout from “far-right” groups at a rally in Glasgow.
A counter-protest organised by Stand Up to Racism (SUTR) took place in George Square on Saturday afternoon in opposition to a “pro-UK” rally which had been promoted by Tommy Robinson.
Campaigners with SUTR outnumbered those on the “pro-UK” side with police putting up barriers in the square to separate the two groups.
READ MORE: Glasgow: Protesters mock Tommy Robinson at George Square rally
Speaking to The National, Glasgow City Council leader Susan Aitken said: “I’m really pleased today that the turnout from the far-right is very small.
“I’m advised by colleagues in Police Scotland that around 150 of them have shown up. Clearly, it is many, many, many times that number of people who have come along to make their voices heard against the far-right and for solidarity and unity in our great, multicultural, diverse city of Glasgow.”
We previously told how protesters had mocked Tommy Robinson, with one person chanting “Tommy’s on the beach”.
Prior to the rally, Aitken had already said that Robinson was not welcome in the city after promoting the demonstration on his social media.
The councillor added: “There hasn’t been any trouble so far. We’re now quite far into the event so I’m hoping that things will all pass off peacefully and I think it’s probably been the best outcome that we could have had today.”
Earlier this week, Assistant Chief Constable Gary Ritchie said a policing plan was in place and violence and disorder would be dealt with "swiftly and robustly".
NEW: Police push back far-right protesters at today's rally in Glasgow.
— The National (@ScotNational) September 7, 2024
Hundreds of Stand Up to Racism campaigners are also in George Square for a counter-protest. pic.twitter.com/UBjvnymvTf
He said: "We are aware of a planned protest in George Square, Glasgow, on Saturday, September 7, and a proportionate policing plan is in place.
"Police Scotland is a rights-based organisation and we have been engaging directly with the protest groups to ensure public safety, while balancing their right to peacefully demonstrate.
"Violence and disorder are not legitimate protest and anyone who engages in disorder will be dealt with swiftly and robustly."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel