THE Scottish Conservatives have descended into yet more in-fighting after Ruth Davidson backed Russell Findlay to lead the party and took aim at his opponents.
Writing in the Scottish Daily Mail, Baroness Davidson of Lundin Links criticised leadership candidate Murdo Fraser's plan to stage a commission on the party’s future.
The former leader claimed that the idea was a "Trojan horse" to split the Scottish party from its UK counterpart.
“At its very core, our party is based on the principle that we achieve progress, prosperity and security by working across the whole United Kingdom," she said.
"It’s what makes us Unionists.
“So we must put this plan for a party-splitting ‘commission’ back in its box, nail down the lid and get back to the job of building our party up, not breaking it up.”
READ MORE: Scottish Greens cast doubt on whether they will support SNP budget
Davidson then backed Findlay for the leadership, claiming he has a "natural understanding of the concerns of mainstream voters".
She added that the success the party achieved under her leadership, when Tories became the largest opposition party at Holyrood, was down to three things – “a good team, good communication of a positive message, and bloody hard work”.
However, she claimed the lessons of her leadership had not been taken forward.
“I find it a bit depressing how the lessons of those years of progress seem to have been forgotten by some of my former colleagues at Holyrood," she added.
“Where has the positivity gone? Where is that uplifting message of hope? What happened to that spirit of teamwork?
“I want what’s best for the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party that I was so proud to lead, so proud to serve and so proud to help rebuild.
“I want to see it undergo the same renewal we accomplished after 2011 and go on to achieve even greater success.
“But that can only happen if our members – both elected and from the grassroots – pull together and work as a team.
“And that team can only be built if it is led by the right person, with the right ideas and the right values. The values of decent, hard-working, law-abiding, community-spirited, mainstream Scotland.
“I am convinced that person is Russell Findlay. It’s why I have chosen to support him in his campaign to be elected as our next leader.”
READ MORE: UK Government brings in bill to remove hereditary peers from Lords
Yet allies of Murdo Fraser have spoken out against Davidson's article, saying she is "misrepresenting" Fraser's position on splitting from the UK party.
Tory MSP Brian Whittle said: "I have so much respect for Ruth but I am disappointed to see her perpetuate this untruth.
"I have been very clear I want closer ties with our colleagues in Westminster and wouldn’t support any attempt to split.
I feel this article misrepresents my colleagues - five of the other leadership candidates - who agreed to a commission to review how we are set up and organised as a Party and report back to the membership.
— Stephen Kerr MSP (@RealStephenKerr) September 5, 2024
Nobody is proposing a separate party; there is no Trojan horse. https://t.co/CATIDYUj63
"This is no way to conduct this contest."
Meanwhile his colleague Stephen Kerr added: "I feel this article misrepresents my colleagues – five of the other leadership candidates – who agreed to a commission to review how we are set up and organised as a party and report back to the membership.
"Nobody is proposing a separate party; there is no Trojan horse."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel