THE SNP have hit out at the Labour Government’s move to suspend less than 10% of the UK’s arms export licenses to Israel.
On Monday afternoon, Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs that after a review, the UK Government will be suspending around 30 arms export licences out of approximately 350 amid a “clear risk” they could have been used to breach international humanitarian law in Gaza.
Lammy said the Government does “not take this decision lightly” and stressed it is “not an arms embargo”.
But the SNP’s Brendan O’Hara challenged the decision (below).
The MP for Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber told the House of Commons: “Of course, we welcome anything which reduces the appalling death toll in Gaza and increasingly, sadly, in the West Bank.”
He added: “Could I press (Mr Lammy) on the issue of the UK recognising that the Netanyahu government’s use of UK weapons poses a clear list of the violation of international humanitarian law.
“You will be aware that there is no legal definition between what is an offensive weapon and what is a defensive weapon. So why and on what basis, if there is, in his words, a clear risk of the violation of international humanitarian law, why has he not imposed a blanket ban on Israel until that risk has gone away completely?”
Lammy defended not imposing a blanket ban, saying that O’Hara should “recognise the real threats that Israel faces” – including from Lebanese Hezbollah, as well as what the “Houthis are doing now in the Red Sea”.
READ MORE: 'Partly UK-made jet used in Israeli attack that killed Gaza civilians'
He added: “It’s for that basis that my remarks are measured and I defend that.”
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesperson Layla Moran, meanwhile, urged the Government to “go further” by ending trade with illegal settlements in the West Bank.
She told MPs: “I urge the Government to go further. Will they not ban goods produced in the legal Israeli settlements? If the settlements are illegal, why are we allowing trade with them?
“And will they sanction Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, as the EU’s Josep Borrell is considering, or can (Foreign Secretary David Lammy) at least say that when it comes to violent extremists, nothing and no one is off the table?”
Lammy replied: “We condemn the settler expansion, the record levels that we’ve seen this year, particularly, and of course, the increase in settler violence.
“And I condemn the language that’s been used by ministers in the Israeli government, Smotrich, Ben-Gvir, particularly in relation to this. It’s entirely unacceptable language and should be condemned by the Israeli government as a whole.
“(Ms Moran) raises important issues, and she recognises that, of course, in terms of labelling, we do label in relation to goods from settlements alongside the 1967 borders particularly, but the issues are very, very complex.”
Independent MP Apsana Begum also urged the Government to go further and suspend all arms sales to Israel.
The Poplar and Limehouse MP said: “Given that over 40,000 Palestinians have now been killed, given that Israel is expanding its military operations in the occupied West Bank, and given that the former foreign office official resigned stating ‘that it is actually quite clear that Israel is perpetuating war crimes in plain site’, will the UK Government ensure that the UK is not complicit in Israel’s war crimes, and suspend all arms sales to Israel?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel