STEPHEN Flynn has labelled Anas Sarwar “less hard man, and more hard man to find” during his speech to SNP conference.
The SNP’s Westminster leader said his party must “embrace the humility and honesty of defeat in order to renew our relationship with the Scottish people”.
“[We should show them] that we can speak again to their aspirations and that we have the competence to deliver for them and their families,” he said.
READ MORE: John Swinney: SNP conference speech to show 'optimistic' case for indy
Flynn also hit out at the new Labour government, saying that the “hopeful promise of turning the page on the Tories” had only been replaced with a “promise of painful politics”.
The SNP MP specifically took aim at Sarwar for his failure to stand up to his bosses in Westminster.
He said: “I seem to remember very carefully placed media articles promising that Anas Sarwar would be the first man to stand up to Keir Starmer (below) and his government if he disagreed with their decisions.
“We were promised that he would be the hard man of Scottish politics and wouldn’t be found wanting in standing up for Scotland.
“Turns out he’s less hard man, and more hard man to find.”
Most recently, we told how Sarwar was labelled “spineless” for failing to condemn Keir Starmer’s decision to restrict the Winter Fuel Payment in a move Scottish Labour branded a “desperate attack”.
He has also faced criticism for previously telling John Swinney “Read my lips, no austerity under Labour.”
READ MORE: Read Stephen Flynn's full speech to SNP conference
Flynn said that the Tories had left a “shocking inheritance” and that “I think I even remember John Swinney saying that once or twice during the election campaign – or maybe I wasn’t reading his lips properly”.
The MP added: “[Sarwar's] tucked away trying to think of the latest excuse to justify the shifting sands coming from his bosses in London.
“And conference, when it comes to Anas and his arguments – it’s time to put one thing to bed.
“If you are a Unionist, if you believe that economic policy should be primarily set in London, please stop this nonsense that the economic and budgetary position in Scotland is somehow nothing to do with Westminster.
"You can't on one hand boast about the so-called broad shoulders of the Union while at the very same time wash the other hand of any responsibility for the financial decisions that same Union imposes.
"The seriousness of the situation we face demands better. The Scottish people will not be treated as fools."
Speaking on Scottish independence, Flynn said it was important to be “honest” and acknowledge there has “never been and never will be a seamless path to self-determination".
He told conference: “At times over the last few years we should admit that we were sometimes guilty of giving that impression.
“I understand why that happened. Sometimes the non-stop nature of modern politics fed the strategy of one last push.
“But the intense immediacy of that narrative doesn’t serve the need for patient persuasion of those who still need to be convinced.”
The Sunday National has approached Scottish Labour for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel