JOHN Swinney told SNP members that the party has “been consumed by process on independence,” during an internal election review at conference.
According to a report in The Times, a leaked recording from Friday’s review revealed the First Minister warned activists they need to win back Scotland’s middle class or the party could face another heavy election defeat.
Members were presented with internal polling analysis which showed a number of voters were switching to the Labour Party once they begin earning an annual salary of more than “the low £20,000s”.
READ MORE: Labour will ‘take a hammer’ to public services, Stephen Flynn to say
The newspaper reports that Swinney warned the party has to take the findings “very seriously” and that the Scottish Government’s performance had “faltered”.
He said: “I’m not standing in front of you in denial. I came in to lead this party a few months ago to try to rebuild the party because I could see the scale of difficult we face.”
The Times further reports that Swinney highlighted a number of mistakes which have been made, including independence becoming a lower priority among voters despite efforts to move it up the agenda.
He also pointed to the SNP’s “very visible problems,” and said Labour’s election message of change had “dwarfed” his party’s campaign push.
Swinney (above) added that the party had spent too long focusing on the process of independence and said he would “never treat the party membership with contempt”.
We told on Friday how a number of former SNP MPs said they felt the internal meeting was “constructive” while the party’s Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said he felt it was “very positive”.
The Times reports that Flynn also spoke at the meeting and that he said Yes supporters had been told too many times that “this will be it, this will be it, this will be it,” before repeated pushes for a second referendum failed to materialise.
He further urged the SNP to “reflect very carefully on language and rhetoric” and to treat Unionists with greater respect to try win them over to the party.
Swinney also said he would use his keynote speech to conference on Sunday to “explain the substance of independence, the advantage of independence, the possibility of independence” as part of a shift in strategy.
Also included in the review was a presentation by former minister Marco Biagi.
His analysis showed support had fallen “over the preceding 18 months,” which covered the resignations of Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf.
READ MORE: BBC editor had cheek to say The National is ‘propaganda’
He said that Labour appealed to a wider range of voters than the SNP with people “much more likely to vote Labour at higher incomes”.
Challenged on this by one delegate, Swinney said: “We’ve got to take that point very seriously. I got criticised many years ago for saying that I thought we had to be lined up alongside aspirational Scots.
“I got absolutely panned for saying that but I was right. This party won in 2007, and 2011 and 2016 and 2021 because we commanded the middle class.”
Swinney admitted the SNP “got to a position where we disappointed voters” but insisted the party could still win the 2026 Holyrood election.
“We’ve got to work to create a purposeful and united party,” Swinney said.
“I will say this in this session - I won’t say it in public – but we have got to be more cohesive.
“If we are not more cohesive then I think you can all work out what’s going to happen. You saw what happened when we weren’t cohesive in the election in July.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel