LABOUR – at least the UK lot – have been at pains to ensure everyone knows they never wanted to cut the Winter Fuel Payment for millions of pensioners.
Just have a look at what Keir Starmer said in the Rose Garden on Tuesday, when he warned his government would bring in austerity. Sorry, not that. A “painful” Budget that is austere.
“I didn’t want to means-test the Winter Fuel Payment,” Starmer told the UK. “But it was a choice we had to take.”
Or look at what Chancellor Rachel Reeves said as she announced the cut in the first instance.
“I am making the difficult decision that those not in receipt of pension credit or certain other means-tested benefits will no longer receive the Winter Fuel Payment …
“Let me be clear: this is not a decision I wanted to make, nor is it the one that I expected to make.”
Except, a newly unearthed clip has shown Reeves – 10 years ago and firmly on the opposition benches – arguing for the Winter Fuel Payment to be cut back.
Rachel Reeves has repeatedly said she didn't want to cut the universal winter fuel allowance for pensioners but it was a tough decision forced on her because of the financial black hole left by the last govt
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) August 28, 2024
Here's Reeves 10 years ago: pic.twitter.com/1BAIL4racv
In a video shared on social media by Saul Staniforth, Reeves said: “We are the party who have said that we would cut the winter fuel allowance for the richest pensioners.
“We're the party that said we would means-test that benefit to save money, something which on the other side of the house you haven't supported.
“So the reality is we're the party who are willing to take tough decisions.”
It’s unfortunate for Reeves that everything said in the UK parliament is dutifully recorded by Hansard, or people might have been led into believing she actually didn’t plan to cut the Winter Fuel Payment.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour shamed as top Welsh minister calls out Winter Fuel Payment cut
For once, it seems Scottish Labour group leader Anas Sarwar is the one telling the honest truth.
While his London bosses who actually cut the Winter Fuel Payment have gone around insisting they never wanted to do any such thing, Sarwar has openly and repeatedly said he supports the move.
The Scottish Labour MSP even went so far as to describe the cut as an “opportunity” for Scotland.
If Sarwar does manage to become first minister after 2026 – as many Unionist commentators are breathlessly repeating he will – just imagine what more “opportunities” Labour have in store for shivering Scots.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel