Good evening and welcome to the latest edition of Media Watch, where we keep an eagle eye on the news and how it's delivered by mainstream platforms.
Remember you can get the newsletter in your inbox every week for free by sigining up here.
It was “inappropriate” for a BBC journalist to brand The National as “propaganda”, an expert has said, as he criticised remarks made on a Radio 4 podcast.
Tom Mills, who released his book The BBC: Myth of a Public Service in 2016, said he was “surprised” the word was used by business and economy editor Douglas Fraser when the journalist was describing the newspaper on an episode of The Media Show last week.
During the panel appearance, Fraser suggested that independence hadn't been as important for newspaper sales and loyalty as expected after the 2014 referendum in Scotland.
"One title with a strong propaganda approach to supporting independence, The National, a sister paper of The Herald, based in Glasgow, makes some waves politically through its propaganda," Fraser told the programme.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland editor brands The National 'propaganda' multiple times
He added that it didn't seem there was "much to be gained commercially" from taking sides on the constitutional debate.
Mills (above), who lectures in sociology at Aston University in Birmingham, said he was surprised by the remarks given that every newspaper in the UK has a political stance.
He told The National: “I am surprised a senior BBC journalist would describe a newspaper this way.
“The British press have always assumed editorial positions on key political issues, and most titles are aligned with political parties.
“Yet it is very rare for The Daily Telegraph, for example, to be described by BBC journalists as producing pro-Tory propaganda."
Mills said the journalist had called into question The National's "political legitimacy and integrity" by using the term, adding: “I don’t think this use [of the word] is appropriate.”
READ MORE: Cuts in UK's arts sector are 'of great concern', says Fringe boss
In his book in 2016, Mills argued that despite its claim to be independent and impartial, the BBC “has always sided with the elite” and “has been in thrall to those in power” throughout its existence.
After being asked how Fraser’s comments met impartiality guidelines, BBC Scotland said it accepted that the word "propaganda" should not have been used, but the corporation has not made any apology.
In a statement, a spokesperson said: "In a live BBC radio interview Douglas was making the point that The National is strongly supportive of one side of the constitutional debate, but we accept he should not have used the word propaganda."
The National is explicitly pro-independence, with a tagline under its masthead stating it is “the newspaper that supports an independent Scotland”.
However, the publication – which is marking its 10th anniversary this year - does not support any one political party.
The BBC was approached for further comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel