MINISTERS have been urged to reconsider scrapping plans to give asylum seekers free bus travel across Scotland – and scolded for the “unfair” way the news was made public.
The Scottish Government last week shelved plans to roll out a national pilot scheme to pay for asylum seekers to travel for free on buses, blaming insufficient funds.
Greens MSP Mark Ruskell and Labour’s Paul Sweeney have written to the Scottish Government asking ministers to reverse their “misguided” decision.
In a letter to Equalities Minister Kaukab Stewart and Fiona Hyslop, Transport Secretary, the MSPs expressed their “deep disappointment” at the change.
They said: “The pilots which have already taken place in Scotland, including in Glasgow and Aberdeen, demonstrate the value of free bus travel for people seeking asylum – some of whom are on as little as £1.36 a day and regularly choosing between food and transport.
READ MORE: Scottish Government scraps free bus travel for asylum seekers
“Turning back on this commitment, which would provide support for some of the most vulnerable in our society, is misguided and we would strongly urge you to reconsider this decision.”
Ruskell and Sweeney also asked to be informed if there were plans for the pilot to go ahead at a later date.
And they hit out at the way the decision was announced – after refugee and asylum seeker organisations were told about the change by Stewart (below) during an event at Glasgow University to mark the launch of the Scottish Government’s new refugee integration strategy.
They added: “We also wish to note our serious concerns around the way this decision was reached and subsequently communicated.
"Despite this decision being shared privately in a meeting with a handful of organisations last week and announced verbally by you at the strategy launch on August 19, we understand that this decision has not been officially confirmed in writing to stakeholders.
READ MORE: Figures reveal 13 asylum seekers have taken their own lives in past two years
“The funding for the pilot was confirmed and announced in October 2023 and third sector organisations tell us they have been inundated with enquiries about when free bus travel will be available since then.”
They added that refugee organisations had come as a “serious shock to many people in the asylum system and the organisations that support them” and said making the U-turn “without official communication and at such short notice is unfair”.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “This letter was only sent on Friday and ministers will respond in due course.
“As MSPs will be aware, we are unfortunately having to take some very difficult decisions to deliver balanced and sustainable spending plans for the 2024-25 financial year."
They said that asylum seekers under the age of 22 or older than 60 would still get free bus travel as part of other concession schemes and said the Scottish Government remained "committed to supporting people seeking asylum".
The spokesperson added: "We want to work collaboratively with the UK Government to contribute ideas that build on shared priorities and where possible provide evidence of impacts and needs.
"By working together and sharing learning, there is great potential for tangible improvements to be made for refugees and people seeking asylum living in the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel