THE BOSS of Ofgem has been slammed as “disgraceful” after explaining that the reason the price cap is being lifted by 10% is to allow energy companies to make a “small profit”.
The average household energy bill is to increase by £149 from October after the energy regulator announced the move today as homes approach the winter months, amid fears for pensioners already contending with Labour cutting the Winter Fuel Payment.
Speaking on the BBC’s Breakfast Show (below), Jonathan Brearley was asked for the reasoning behind lifting the cap by 10%.
The head of Ofgem, which boasts its job is to protect energy customers, explains its increasing bills by 10% because it has to allow energy companies to make a small profit.
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) August 23, 2024
Last year British Gas profits increased 10 fold to £750m. pic.twitter.com/8mYnScxuLg
“The main reason is that the price cap is designed in a way that energy companies can recover fair costs and a small profit, but no more than that,” he said.
“And when those costs change, those costs unfortunately do feed through.”
But the Ofgem chief executive was slammed for the comments, with some highlighting that the likes of British Gas announced earlier this year that its profits for 2023 increased 10-fold to £750m.
“I’m sorry but whilst energy companies are showing record profits there should be no increase to the cap,” said one social media user.
“All this demonstrates is either Ofgem are a toothless organisation or they don’t have the interests of the general public first.”
"Everything wrong with our country and the energy sector," said another in response. "This is why we need real publicly owned energy, it’s an essential service not a luxury for profit."
READ MORE: Martin Lewis in warning to Labour amid energy bill increase
SNP drugs minister Christina McKelvie, meanwhile, called it “disgraceful”.
“[And] it exposes the total nonsense of Labour’s election campaign on cheaper energy for households,” she added.
“Not content with freezing pensioners they are now allowing a 10% rise many folk can’t afford.”
Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently announced that the UK Government would cut back the Winter Fuel Payment, which was previously universal and worth between £100 and £300 for British pensioners.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel