MARTIN Lewis has warned that Labour must “rethink” the decision to cut Winter Fuel Payments after Ofgem increased the price cap.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently announced that the UK Government would cut back the Winter Fuel Payment, which was previously universal and worth between £100 and £300 for British pensioners.
But now, the average household energy bill is to increase by £149 from October after Ofgem said today it was increasing its price cap as homes approach the winter months.
READ MORE: Are Scottish Labour secretly haemorrhaging members?
The money saving expert took to Twitter/X to give his thoughts (below), including a warning that “almost all pensioners” will need to find £100s more than last winter.
“While energy will cost less than during last winter’s crisis time, the reduction in rates only equates to a drop of roughly £100 over the six winter months for a household with typical usage,” he said.
“Yet specific pensioner energy support has dropped by far more. Last year pensioner homes got up to £300 extra per household cost of living support - that’s gone, and its loss alone is far bigger than the savings made by slightly lower rates.”
NEWS. ENERGY PRICE CAP TO RISE 10% on 1 OCT. (pls share). Here's my instant briefing incl who it'll hit hardest, why govt needs change winter fuel payments, standing charges & WHAT TO DO NOW. First, here's the average Direct Debit Cap (it varies by region)
— Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) August 23, 2024
ELEC
- Standing charge…
Lewis then added that the Labour government’s new decision to means test Winter Fuel Payments will “leave all except usually those who claim Pension Credit missing out on a further £200 - £300”.
He said: “While there's a strong argument for ending the universality of Winter Fuel payments, eligibility is being squeezed to too narrow a group. Those just above the thresholds will be hardest hit.
"I'm due to meet the Chancellor in a couple of weeks, and will then be urging her to look at methods to widen eligibility – such as to homes in council tax bands A to D – an imperfect but workable proxy for lower household incomes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel