THERE is a “real prospect” that UK Government ministers and officials may be held liable under international law for crimes committed by Israel, according to a leading barrister.
In a legal opinion commissioned by the campaign group Global Justice Now, Cornerstone Barristers’ Sam Fowles looked at whether individuals in the UK could be in breach of international law as a result of aid and assistance given to Israel through a principle known as “vicarious liability”.
Fowles noted rulings from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which said that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian areas such as Gaza and the West Bank are unlawful, and that Palestinians’ rights under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide have “plausibly” been violated.
He noted that ministers or officials within the UK Government could be found vicariously liable “where they have rendered aid and assistance which has facilitated the wrong and have done so with knowledge of the wrong … or the knowledge that, in the normal course of events, the wrong is almost certain to occur”.
READ MORE: Ian Murray hails new trade talks with Israel as 'great news for Brand Scotland'
Fowles also said it is likely that the UK’s trading relationship with Israel – which the Labour government are looking to strengthen – has helped to facilitate the illegal occupation of Palestinian territory.
Commenting on Fowles’s analysis, Global Justice Now’s Tim Bierley said: “Alarm bells should be sounding across Whitehall at this legal opinion: the UK Government is putting its own ministers and civil servants at risk of prosecution by its continued failure to withhold support for Israel's actions.
“What on earth is it waiting for? It is long overdue for the UK to match words with actions by immediately suspending arms sales, trade talks and other aid and assistance to Israel."
The news comes after senior Foreign Office official Mark Smith resigned his post amid concerns that the UK Government was knowingly breaching international law.
“Each day we witness clear and unquestionable examples of war crimes and breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza perpetrated by the State of Israel,” Smith said.
READ MORE: Gaza death toll passes 40,000 Palestinians killed in Israel's bombardment
He added: “I can no longer carry out my duties in the knowledge that this department may be complicit in war crimes.”
He added that he was “a subject matter expert in the domain of armed sales policy”, having formerly worked on the arms exports licensing assessment in the Middle East and North Africa Department (MENAD).
While in opposition, now-Foreign Secretary David Lammy called on the Tory-run government to publish its legal advice on whether arms exports to Israel are in breach of international law.
However, now in power the Labour MP has refused to do so himself, while Israel weapons exports continue.
In a letter sent to Lammy, Global Justice Now director Nick Dearden urged the UK Government to “withdraw all aid and assistance to Israel that risks supporting wrongful acts, including genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity”.
Dearden said this should include:
- Placing an immediate and complete arms embargo on Israel;
- Committing not to enter into any free trade agreement with Israel until it has ended its attacks on Gaza and its unlawful occupation of the Palestinian territories;
- Suspending trade privileges, agreements and negotiations with Israel with immediate effect;
- Suspending cooperation with Israel’s defence sector and any sectors of Israel’s economy involved with the illegal occupation and/or the military operation in Gaza.
According to its export policy, the UK Government must block the supply of weapons to a nation if there is “a clear risk” that the items might be used to commit or facilitate “internal repression” or “a serious violation of international humanitarian law”.
The UK Government's Foreign Office and Trade Department – which jointly hold responsibility over arms exports – were both sent Fowles’s legal opinion and asked for comment.
A UK Government spokesperson said in response: “This government is committed to upholding international law. We have made clear that we will not export items if they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of International Humanitarian Law.
“There is an ongoing review process to assess whether Israel is complying with International Humanitarian Law, which the Foreign Secretary initiated on day one in office. We will provide an update as soon as that review process has been completed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel