DOUG Beattie has quit as leader of the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) - having previously been tipped as the man who could "save the Union".
Beattie issued a statement confirming he was standing down after a morning of intense speculation over his future amid apparent internal tensions with other senior party figures.
The Upper Bann Assembly member was elected UUP leader in 2021.
His resignation comes after what was a relatively positive general election result for the UUP, with the party securing a Westminster seat for the first time since 2017.
READ MORE: SNP branch calls for Angus Robertson to be sacked from cabinet role
Beattie said it has been a “huge honour” to lead the party.
“It has not been easy and at times it has been both lonely and isolating,” he said.
“I am no stranger to leadership and that is how it often feels in taking a toll both physically and mentally. It also strains friendships and political relationships.
“It is now clear that some believe the momentum needed to keep the Ulster Unionist Party moving in the right direction cannot come from me.
“Irreconcilable differences between myself and party officers combined with the inability to influence and shape the party going forward means that I can no longer remain the party leader.
“Therefore, I shall stand down as the party leader and allow the party to immediately begin the process to select a new leader who may maintain the confidence of the party and continue the momentum I have started.
READ MORE: YouTube blocks Neil Oliver video amid 'antisemitism' claims
“It is important to acknowledge the loyalty and support from many within the party. This includes the MLA group and many other elected and non-elected members.
“I must also acknowledge that some did not agree with the direction and path I set for the party, and the vision I promoted. I hope they can see that in the long term only an inclusive Ulster Unionist Party, promoting a positive message, can secure our future.
“I hope the new leader is given the freedom to act.”
Former Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson (below) previously described Beattie as “quite probably” the man who would save the Union.
In an article for Unherd in 2021, she insisted the “fight for the future of the UK is about to enter a new phase” and that “those who believe in the Union must turn their gaze west”.
She pointed to Beattie as a pro-Union voice whose “mix of statesman and soldier, parliamentary chamber and sergeant’s mess hall has struck a chord” with the electorate.
Davidson also highlighted his “impeccable unionist credentials – military service for the crown, his uncle’s death at the hands of the IRA, the fact that he grew up on Union Street in Portadown” and said that this gave him “much greater licence to talk freely and generously about Irish identity”.
Beattie said he took over as leader at the beginning of a three-year election cycle with an overall aim of addressing the decline of the UUP, enhancing its influence and returning it to Westminster.
“Following the recent General Election results, the party has now returned to the green benches after an absence of seven years,” he said.
“Our share of the vote had increased slightly, and we have also elevated a member to the House of Lords. This is something we have not achieved in 13 years; a move that demonstrates our increased influence at the highest levels of government.
“The party will now re-establish its parliamentary party to help increase our influence and ensure the Ulster Unionists’ voice, promoting a positive, optimistic, pro-union vision, is heard.
“These are small successes on the back of a difficult electoral results with a lot of work still to do, particularly in border constituencies. Nevertheless, they are successes which requires momentum to capitalise on the opportunities they present.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel