AN SNP branch is pushing for Angus Robertson to be suspended from his cabinet role after meeting with an Israeli diplomat.
The party’s Dalkeith branch has reportedly submitted a motion of censure against the External Affairs Secretary which alleges he has brought the SNP into disrepute by holding talks with Daniela Grudsky, deputy Israeli ambassador to the UK.
The motion makes two “demands”. One is that Robertson should be investigated by the SNP’s conduct committee for “bringing the party into disrepute”. The other is that he should be suspended as a minister pending a Scottish Government investigation.
Calls for action to be taken against Robertson have intensified over the weekend after the SNP decided to suspend Glasgow MSP John Mason after he appeared to deny a genocide was taking place in Gaza.
The Sunday Mail also reported that John Swinney asked Robertson to attend the meeting with Grudsky.
READ MORE: Ex-MPs give verdict on what must be debated at SNP election review
The Scottish Government has confirmed Grudsky had initially asked to meet Swinney but that diplomatic protocol dictated that she meet Robertson instead.
The meeting – which involved Grudsky and Robertson discussing “areas of mutual interest” - was only made public four days after it took place.
According to The Times, the Dalkeith branch has now submitted a motion – which may be debated at the SNP’s conference later this month – arguing that action should be taken because Robertson held the meeting despite the International Court of Justice, the UN’s highest court, having ruled last month that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories was unlawful.
The motion argues the fact that areas of co-operation to benefit both Scotland and Israel were discussed went against the court’s recommendation that states avoid any action, including aid or assistance, that would help to maintain the present situation.
It highlights “impassioned” speeches at last year’s conference by Humza Yousaf, then first minister, and his wife Nadia El-Nakla, a councillor in Dundee whose parents were trapped in Gaza after Israel attacked in response to the October 7 assault by Hamas.
El-Nakla has also criticised Robertson’s meeting. In a statement, the SNP Friends of Palestine group – of which she is convener – said: “While we know Mr Robertson called for a ceasefire, we cannot condone his statement advocating for further co-operation between Scotland and Israel, especially while Israel continues its genocide in Gaza and ongoing persecution of Palestinians in the West Bank.
“We would urge the party to issue an apology and a guarantee, especially for our Palestinian citizens, that this normalisation of the state of Israel will not happen again.”
The motion states: “The SNP has led on condemnation of these actions in Gaza and the public trust us to take a moral standpoint.
“The SNP leadership must at all times follow and reflect the wishes of its members as expressed at conference.
“To agree to a meeting for any purpose, other than to singularly condemn the actions of the current government within Israel, is a breach of that trust, trust placed in the hands of senior ministers by both party members and the electorate.”
Other SNP members and organisations, including Scots Asians for Independence, are reportedly helping the Dalkeith branch to drum up support for the motion in an effort to have it heard at the party’s conference, which takes place at the Edinburgh International Conferencen Centre from August 30 to September 1.
The SNP have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel