A LEADING charity has urged the developers of Taymouth Castle estate to “go back to the drawing board” after published access plans for the site sparked anger.
Ramblers Scotland joined locals in Kenmore and around Loch Tay, where US firm Discovery Land Company (DLC) are building an exclusive compound aimed at the mega-rich, in expressing concerns that the access plans break with previous promises.
The site access plan was published on Perth and Kinross Council’s planning portal as part of an application for the “erection of five estate properties, formation of vehicular access, and associated works” on the estate.
The plan shows the ownership boundaries, core paths, and “curtilage”, where people will not be allowed to access. The castle itself as well as the majority of the riverfront to its east are all set to be curtailed, as well as a field containing standing stones.
Local campaigners with the Protect Loch Tay group say that the access plan “eliminates over a third of the Taymouth Estate core paths”, claiming that the “entire north riverbank path has been removed on their access proposal”.
Previously, DLC has committed to allowing people the right to roam through the estate and denied that they are looking to build a gated community, as is their business model elsewhere across the globe.
In a question-and-answer post on the Kenmore Community Council website, DLC representatives were asked: “Will there be path access in the future?”
READ MORE: Taymouth Castle developers withdraw golf garage plans after local outcry
They responded: “Yes. Taymouth is fully committed to maintaining a core path and right to roam through the property now and in the future.”
In August 2023, in response to a letter from now-First Minister John Swinney and SNP depute Westminster leader Pete Wishart, Taymouth Castle managing director David O’Donoghue made a similar commitment.
“Discovery Land Company will fully comply with all legislative requirements, particularly with regard to public access,” O’Donoghue wrote, adding: “Our intent is to follow the spirit of the law.”
In response to DLC’s published access plan, Ramblers Scotland director Brendan Paddy called for a rethink.
He told The National: “The developers have previously stated publicly that they recognise the spirit – as well as the letter – of Scotland’s world-class access rights.
“However, sadly their new access plan is a missed opportunity to put those principles into action. They should go back to the drawing board.”
He added: “We encourage all developers to improve paths, protect public access and create welcoming places for people walking through.
“The best developments do this, while at the same time being attractive places to work and live.”
READ MORE: John Swinney urged to act over 'insulting' response to his Taymouth intervention
A spokesperson from Protect Loch Tay said: “We are very surprised to see DLC’s access strategy plan eliminates over a third of the Taymouth Estate core paths. This is particularly surprising as DLC previously stated that the core paths would remain in place.
“Far from wanting to be part of the community, it seems that at every opportunity, the resort owners are trying to exclude the general public in their quest to create a private enclave for their clientele. They are trying to privatise this large stretch of the River Tay to which everyone, locals and visitors alike, previously had free access.”
The spokesperson said it was “disappointing that small groups such as Protect Loch Tay” were being forced to scrutinise DLC so closely, adding: “Where are the politicians who claim to be protecting Scotland and its people’s freedoms?”
DLC did not respond to The National’s request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel