DOUGLAS Ross reportedly tried to quit as Scottish Tory leader more than a year ago and install an ally in his place.
Ross is said to have invited Kathleen Robertson, the unsuccessful Tory candidate for Moray West, Nairn and Strathspey, to his home last July to cut a deal which would have seen her stand down so he could take a run at the seat.
The Telegraph reports that Ross pledged he would quit as Scottish Tory leader if selected as “his heart was in Westminster, not Holyrood”.
She turned down his offer of a deal, which is said to have involved installing the current favourite to replace him, Russell Findlay (below), in his place.
Findlay’s allies told the paper the West of Scotland MSP was unaware the meeting had taken place and have dismissed claims there is an establishment plot within the party to have him replace Ross.
Ross said that he had requested the meeting at the request of local party members to check Robertson was “committed to standing for the seat”.
READ MORE: SNP MP voices 'anger' over Scottish Government meeting with Israel
He is facing criticism from within the Scottish Tory ranks amid talk of a stitch up to install Findlay in the top job.
Robertson has confirmed The Telegraph’s version of events and it has been reported that though her selection as the candidate was kept secret until after her children finished their exams it was well-known in local Tory circles.
The paper also reported that Robertson had initially only told a small number of close friends about Ross’s request but started to circulate the story more widely amid the furore about the decision to ditch David Duguid as a candidate.
Ross has faced accusations he was behind a stitch-up to get rid of Duguid (above), who at the time had been hospitalised with a serious spinal injury which left him unable to walk.
The party said he was too sick to contest the election, something he vehemently denied.
The Scottish Tories also denied that Ross was behind the plot to get rid of Duguid, saying the decision to end the former MP’s candidacy had been taken by the party management board – of which both Ross and party chairman Craig Hoy are members.
Ross and Robertson were both defeated in their Westminster bids earlier this year, with the SNP taking both seats.
READ MORE: Hundreds complain to BBC after English riot described as 'pro-British'
A Tory source told The Telegraph: “I think his offer to her indicates that even over a year ago there were plans to install Russell Findlay as Scottish party leader.
“He was telling MSPs at the time it was his intention to leave Westminster and he wanted to be first minister. A few never believed that and I think Douglas should stand down immediately as leader.”
Referring to the decision to replace Duguid, they said: “It’s all connected. I think the conversation shows that Douglas Ross wanted somehow to get a seat. He saw his chance and took it in a fairly brutal fashion.”
A spokesman for Findlay said: “Russell had no knowledge whatsoever of any alleged discussions of this nature.
“He is focused on campaigning positively to build a common-sense Conservative movement based on aspiration and opportunity.”
Ross (above) said: “Several weeks had passed since Kathleen had become the candidate but she had still not publicly announced this, so at the request of some local members I met with Kathleen to see if she was still committed to standing for the seat.
READ MORE: John Swinney challenges Angela Rayner on Winter Fuel Payment cut in Edinburgh meeting
“She confirmed that she was and I then campaigned with her in the hope that she would win the new constituency.
“Throughout the leadership election, I have said absolutely nothing about the candidates or the contest, other than I will remain as leader until my successor is appointed. My decision to remain neutral throughout the contest will not change.”
A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: “This was a private conversation between Douglas and Kathleen, and not a party matter.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel