THE Scottish Government has dismissed an appeal against a council’s decision to reject plans for 180 homes.
AS Homes had proposed the development – which it claimed would’ve provided a £40 million investment in new housing – for land at Ferguslie Park near Junction 29 at St James Interchange.
However, the blueprint for a mix of two, three, four and five-bedroom properties was refused at the planning and climate change policy board of Renfrewshire Council back in March.
The reasons cited included an “unacceptable impact” on school infrastructure and a lack of “suitable integration and connectivity with the surrounding area” because of a reliance on a single access point from Ferguslie Park Avenue.
The housebuilder challenged the ruling to the Scottish Government through its agent Keppie Design in April, arguing the proposal was compliant with the development plan and branding both reasons for refusal as “unreasonable”.
READ MORE: Interactive map shows all of Scotland's vacant land – from MoD sites to coal mines
But this week, Stuart West, the reporter appointed by ministers, issued a decision notice which confirmed the appeal was unsuccessful.
While he did not side with the council on matters relating to education and potential developer contributions, he said: “I … agree with the council that the proposed development does not provide suitable integration and connectivity with the surrounding area.”
Planning permission in principle was previously granted in 2019 for a mixed-use development, which included residential and other uses, such as hotels and a pub or restaurant.
This appeal sought the approval of matters specified in three of the conditions attached to that decision to allow 180 homes to be built.
The land in question has been labelled an “absolute eyesore” by elected members, while Keppie had argued the council’s decision prevented “regeneration of a long-derelict, brownfield site”.
But ultimately the plans will not be able to go ahead in their current form after the decision of the planning and environmental appeals division.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel