THE Scottish Government took in £1.7 billion more in revenue last year than before, according to new statistics which hailed growth fuelled by a strong labour market.
Officials said the extra funding had helped to pay for the health and social care sector and the Scottish Child Payment.
Declining North Sea oil meant Scotland’s deficit had risen to stand at 10.4% of gross domestic product (GDP), which is a measure of the national economy.
The deficit stood at £22.7bn last year, according to Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) statistics published on Wednesday morning.
That is up from a deficit of 9% of GDP at the last count. A “significant” amount of this is spent repaying UK Government debt, the Scottish Government said.
GERS figures set out the difference between the Scottish Government’s total revenue and total expenditure.
Falling income from the North Sea was offset by growth in other state revenues. Non-North Sea revenues were up by £5.7bn, an increase of 7.2%, with North Sea revenues down by £3.9bn to £4bn.
READ MORE: What is the GERS report and how is it calculated?
The Scottish Government attributed this fall to declining production levels and energy prices coming down from historic peaks.
Overall, Scottish public sector revenue was £88.5bn, or 8.1% of total UK revenue, with £4bn of this coming from the North Sea.
Total spending was up by 6% from the last count to £111.2bn.
Speaking at a press conference for the announcement of the GERS figures, Finance Secretary Shona Robison (above) said onshore revenues were “growing faster than in the rest of the UK”, which she put down to Scotland’s “progressive approach to tax and the revenue from renewable energy”.
She added: “As the report makes clear, the notional deficit is not a reflection on the finances or policies of the Scottish Government – it is a reflection of UK Government choices.
READ MORE: Electric 'super highway' between Scotland and England given green light
“It is also important to emphasise that these figures reflect Scotland status as part of the UK.
“As figures from the Office for National Statistics show, the UK economic model is driven by London and the South East of England. The UK Government retains control of 40% of expenditure and over 70% of revenues in Scotland.
“Indeed, a significant portion of the spending allocated to Scotland relates to servicing UK Government debt, which is paid at a higher rate than our European neighbours.
“As an independent nation, we would have the powers to make different choices. As it is, we are using all the powers we do have to deliver our priorities of growing the economy, investing in net zero, eradicating child poverty and delivering strong public services.”
Unionists argue it indicates the deficit level, which is higher than the UK-wide level, an independent Scotland could expect. Independence supporters say it does not reflect how Scotland could make different choices in taxation and public spending after independence.
The UK Government seized on figures showing that average spending was £2417 more per head in Scotland than in the rest of the UK.
Scotland Office minister Kirsty McNeill said: “These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom.
“By pooling and sharing resources across the UK, Scots benefit by £2417 more per head in public spending than the UK average. That means more money for schools and hospitals, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas.”
Scottish Labour argued higher spending north of the Border should result in “better public services”.
The party’s finance spokesperson Michael Marra said: “On attainment in our schools and waiting times in our hospitals people deserve so much better. We need to drive waiting times down and attainment up.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel