WORKERS on Edinburgh’s tram network have voted to back strike action in a dispute over a lack of toilet breaks.
Members of Unite the union have voted overwhelmingly in favour of strike action – more than 90% of tram workers balloted – meaning more than 160 workers could take action in a matter of weeks.
The union said late running services mean drivers are unable to take a break ahead of their next departure, which has led to health issues among members.
READ MORE: Trade unions show support for Glasgow anti-racism demo
Unite said 160 staff could strike after a ballot was backed by more than 90% of its members.
The trade union represents drivers, ticket service assistants, controllers and vehicle maintenance workers.
Sharon Graham (below), general secretary of Unite, said: “Unite’s Edinburgh tram workers have emphatically backed strike action in order to tackle head-on the unacceptable health and safety situation they face.
“They should not be in this situation because Edinburgh Trams should be implementing measures to ensure our members get their comfort breaks.
“We will back our tram membership all the way in the fight for decent workplace conditions.”
Lyn Turner, an industrial officer at the union, added: “Edinburgh’s tram workers are being forced into taking strike action.
READ MORE: Fourteen jobs to be lost as Scottish private school confirms closure
“This is mismanagement plain and simple, and it is having unacceptable consequences for our members.
“Unite wants to resolve this through negotiation but we are running out of track before strike action takes place. If this happens, then Edinburgh Trams will be solely to blame for any disruption. Management has one more chance.”
An Edinburgh Trams spokesman said: “While we are disappointed the union has embarked on a course of action that threatens disruption for customers, we are committed to the wellbeing of colleagues and are doing everything we can to address their concerns.
“As part of this process, we are working closely with the Trams to Newhaven project team, City of Edinburgh Council and colleagues to find a workable solution, including improving the effectiveness of road traffic signals that can have an impact on our timetable and turnaround times at the airport and Newhaven.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel