THE agenda for the SNP’s upcoming party conference has been published and is set to include a two and a half hour review of the General Election result led by John Swinney.
Some party members had previously expressed concern that the draft conference agenda, which was drawn up before the General Election, did not include a reflection on the party’s results, which saw the number of SNP MPs reduced from 47 to 9.
However, on Tuesday a final conference agenda was sent to members with the inclusion of an “Internal Election Review led by Party Leader” on the first day of the conference, which is due to take place at the EICC in Edinburgh from August 30 to September 1.
A resolution submitted by the SNP trade union group urging the party to use “existing land and tax powers as part of a push to increase revenue and transform Scotland’s economy” has also been selected for debate.
READ MORE: Pete Wishart set to release new book on 2014 independence referendum
Other resolutions selected for debate include enshrining the right to abortion in the future constitution of an independent Scotland, which was brought forward by the party’s Elgin branch.
Noting the impact of the US Supreme Court’s ruling which overturned Roe vs Wade, it states that the party should commit to “safeguarding women’s reproductive rights against any potential political or legal regression”.
Another motion proposes backing the decriminalisation of drugs for personal use in a bid to bring down drugs deaths in the country, which was proposed by MSPs Christina McKelvie and Audrey Nicoll.
It reads: “Conference supports the decriminalisation of drugs for personal use - allowing people found in possession of drugs to be treated and supported rather than criminalised and excluded.
“Conference appreciates that decriminalisation is no longer a radical proposal, and that thirty countries around the world have now recognised the harm caused by criminalisation and moved to change their drug laws.”
A motion is also being brought forward by MSPs Colette Stevenson and Bob Doris on ending Westminster austerity.
“Conference resolves that the austerity regime imposed on Scotland by the UK Government since 2010 must now come to an end,” it states.
“Conference recognises that successive UK budgets have fallen far short of what Scotland needs to deliver further investment in social security, public services, and infrastructure, and that the wellbeing of the people of Scotland is consistently undermined by Westminster decision-makers.
“Conference resolves that only the full powers of an independent state will allow Scotland to be free of the regressive and damaging social, fiscal, and economic policies of the UK Government, and to pursue the vision of a fairer, more prosperous Scotland.”
Despite Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar promising that there would be “no austerity under Labour,” Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced huge cuts to public spending after accusing the Tories of a “cover up” in relation to the true state of the UK’s finances.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel