A SENIOR Scottish Tory has urged party members not to engage in “blue-on-blue attacks” after criticising a leadership candidate’s proposal to consider splitting the party from its UK counterpart.
The Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser was accused of a “Trojan horse” attempt to break up the party by shadow Scottish secretary John Lamont.
In 2011, during a leadership race against Ruth Davidson, Fraser proposed breaking away from UK party.
Announcing his bid this week, Fraser said he no longer favoured the move but would set up a commission to assess the relationship between the parties north and south of the Border.
The MSP joined Russell Findlay, Brian Whittle, deputy leader Meghan Gallacher, Liam Kerr and Jamie Greene in the race, with nominations opening on Thursday.
READ MORE: Why no far-right riots in Scotland? John Curtice gives verdict
But Lamont hit out at the idea while simultaneously calling for candidates not to attack one another.
Writing in the Daily Mail, he said: “As it stands, this looks like a commission to separate our party.
“It looks like a Trojan horse for splitting the party and raises more questions than it answers.
“Will we really go into the 2026 Holyrood election and ask voters to back us today, even though we might not exist as a party after that?”
He added: “If it’s a Trojan horse to divide the party, then members should know that upfront.
“If it’s just an attempt to avoid being straight about his position in this leadership contest, that’s not right.
“As Ruth Davidson said a few weeks ago, a divided party is a short route to electoral suicide.”
Lamont served as Ruth Davidson’s campaign manager when she defeated Fraser more than a decade ago.
Yet despite the clear criticism of Fraser, Lamont said candidates should avoiding attacking one other.
“It’s important to avoid ‘blue-on-blue attacks’ in this contest, so I was a little dismayed to see Murdo’s campaign launch include strident criticism of Douglas Ross and his team which, of course, includes Meghan Gallacher, one of the candidates in this race, and several other MSP colleagues,” he wrote.
With encouragement from Parliamentary colleagues, Party activists, & senior figures in the business community, I’m announcing my candidacy today for @ScotTories leadership. This Party - and Scotland - need real change, and with your help I will deliver it (1/4) pic.twitter.com/Ilfl2CgQbY
— Murdo Fraser (@murdo_fraser) August 7, 2024
In Fraser’s campaign launch video he claimed Conservative members had been “let down” by leadership north and south of the border in recent years.
It is not clear which of the six candidates Lamont is backing in the race, although he described deputy leader Meghan Gallacher as a “rising star” in the party and said it was not “appropriate” for a senior MSP such as Fraser to “criticise her personally, even if it was indirectly”.
READ MORE: Warning as Glasgow 'far-right protest' disinformation sweeps social media
Responding on X/Twitter, Fraser said: “I won’t be indulging in blue-on-blue attacks on other candidates or misrepresenting their platforms in the @ScotTories leadership race, and I am disappointed that others don’t seem to be taking the same approach.
“Whoever wins we need to have a united party to go move forward.”
Lamont’s comments were also criticised by leadership candidate Brian Whittle – who said he was “disappointed that John has decided to try and create division where non[e] exists”.
The Tory MSP Stephen Kerr said the proposal for a commission was supported by all leadership candidates except Russell Findlay, adding: “There’s nothing Trojan horse about it.
“The party members would have the final say on the commission’s recommendations, not the party leader. But you know that.”
MSPs in the running to replace Douglas Ross will need 100 nominations by noon on August 22 to make it onto the membership ballot, with a number of hustings due to take place across the country and virtually.
Ballots close on September 26, with the winner announced the following day.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel