KAMALA Harris is facing criticism for her response to pro-Palestine campaigners who interrupted her rally on Wednesday evening.
Around halfway through the Democratic presidential nominee’s remarks, around a dozen protesters could be heard chanting: “Kamala, Kamala, you can’t hide! We won’t vote for genocide.”
Initially, Harris acknowledged the protesters and said she was “here because we believe in democracy” and that everyone had a right to voice their opinions.
Pro-Palestine protesters just disrupted Kamala's speech in Michigan.
— Read No Shortcuts (@JoshuaPHilll) August 8, 2024
Her response: "If you want Donald Trump to win say that. Otherwise, I’m speaking.” pic.twitter.com/Mf0CdEbDQg
“Everyone’s voice matters. But I am speaking now. I am speaking now,” she said.
As the protests continued, Harris’s tone changed and she said: “You know what? If you want Donald Trump to win, then say that.
“Otherwise, I’m speaking.”
READ MORE: Kamala Harris's choice of Tim Walz as running mate is a refreshing change
The crowd could also be heard chanting “Kamala” in an effort to drown out the protesters.
The interruptions highlighted the war in Gaza remains a key issue for voters in Michigan, which has the largest concentration of Arab-Americans in the United States, NBC News reports.
Co-founder of campaign group the Uncommitted National Movement Layla Elabed reportedly told Harris: “Michigan voters want to support you, but we need a policy that will save lives in Gaza right now.
“I meet with community members every day in Michigan who are losing tens and hundreds of family members in Gaza.
“Right now, we need an arms embargo.”
A number of people took to Twitter/X to criticise Harris for her comments, with one user saying it showed she “doesn’t care” about the people of Palestine.
Another said it was a “bad faith response to people who just want to end a genocide” while others added that they were shocked she had said this in Michigan specifically.
More users commented that they felt pro-Palestine protesters should continue to campaign at rallies.
“Imagine doing a speech in Michigan and not discussing the issue of Palestine,” somebody else added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel